Chris Welch uses Designer Pro 365 to illustrate all 3rd level concepts

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

Media on Trial : BBC

Did these events happen? Or did they happen in the way they were reported? And why do YouTube pull Roberts footage of Syria?
Former BBC journalist seems to be following in the well trodden path of John Pilger and others who seek to present truth.

Field Marshall McConnell of Abel Danger 2013 on the BBC, MI5, Jimmy Saville and pedophilia

"Tuesday, 26 November 2013
Was Sir Jimmy Savile an MI5 Asset?
Child abuse campaigner Charles Frith intelligently answers the question was Jimmy Savile an MI5 asset in the affirmative.

Of course Sir Jimmy Savile was an M15 Asset. But what is M15? how does it function? and what is its purpose?

M15, known as Five, is the UK security Service supposed to operate entirely within the UK.

One of their functions is to Vet people who may be given Security Clearance to view UK Secrets. That is secrets MI5 and the people who run the UK part of the international intelligence organization believe it is in their own interests to keep secret. And or otherwise MI5 propagate the fiction that they have enemies from whom secrets must be kept. One secret they want to securely keep is that the main enemy and prime target for MI5 is the British Public.

Yes Jimmy Savile was vetted by MI5 and given top clearance, he could be trusted to keep the secrets of the Police, Special Branch, MI5. the Royal Family, and Politicians like Margaret Thatcher, Peter Morrison and Leon Brittain and others. Savile was a rampant peadophile who exploited and procured children for the child sex trade and porn network. Sir Jimmy Savile was also famous and worked for the State funded and totally corrupt media propaganda arm of the security and intelligence services the BBC. The Telegraph revealed that files show the BBC's has secret links with the Security Service, and at one stage MI5 was responsible for vetting 6,300 different BBC posts - almost a third of the total workforce. All these attributes meant Jimmy Savile was totally under control and a perfect fully vetted intelligence asset.

Savile was also a close friend of the Royals, the rich and the famous and those with secret power such as soviet spy Anthony Blunt. Blunt blocked any investigation into Savile which had not been blocked lower down the chain of command.

The overall function of MI5 is to control the internal population, that is anyone living in the UK. They must prevent this 'internal enemy' from causing trouble to their masters. Their fictional Master is the UK Democratic Government and the high flying group of highly paid civil servants who allegedly support them. Their real masters are the elite behind the Central Banks and global big business. Their Masters business involves arms sales and development, mineral extraction such as gold, diamonds, gas and oil. Their Masters are big landowners and run the lucrative covert organised crime businesses of Drugs, Arms and Pornography.

One secret the Police and MI5 must prevent the British public finding out is that they now function as a secret arm of this global criminal organization and their original function of protecting the Realm and the public has long passed. How do they keep this from innocent insiders and the public who pay them?

Officially it goes something like this, MI5 is the Political arm of the 'Security Services' they liaise through a group called BOX with , what used to be called, Special Branch, the political wing of the Civil Police. This is the open structure.

Secretly the civil police work closely with the MI5 and police officers, in the know, are often seconded to MI5 and visa versa. It is quite disarming to propagate the illusion that there are many independent levels to an organization, by this tactic one level can blame the other with impunity. Those running the show the 'controllers' can then arrange with insiders on each level how they will collectively play out the latest game. All this play acting, funded by the public purse, fools the general public into giving their trust to this amoral and corrupt group of individuals who laugh at the public's naivety.

Of course their are some strategic problems. The organization of so many 'secret agents' cannot be done openly. Memos and orders cannot simply be passed because this paper trail could be exposed. Further the army of people within Police and Security ranks who know nothing about their 'secret masters' and the overall objective have to be kept totally in the dark.

This is where secret societies and clubs like the Freemasons come in handy because agents from the different branches of the organization can meet without 'ringing any bells' It is because of this method of communication that anyone in public office who is a member of any secret or secretive society or group is suspect

So how does all this fit in with Sir Jimmy Savile, systematic child abuse, child trafficking and pornography?

Jimmy Savile was a MI5 Asset, he was untouchable because he secretly worked for the most dangerous secretive criminal organization in the UK. This organization operates under the umbrella of MI5 and the Police and its criminal bosses have immense power and unlimited public money to play with. They can protect anyone they choose to protect and enrich anyone they choose to make rich whilst they can also jail anyone they choose to jail and bankrupt anyone they choose to bankrupt.

So Jimmy Savile was untouchable! Then a few former residents from Duncroft Approved threatened to expose a system which had been hidden for years. So what does the criminal organization do? They plan a controlled exposure. They planned to expose Jimmy Savile themselves and throw a few people who are expendable to the wolves such a Max Clifford, and Stuart Hall. It also has the added advantage of scaring anyone who might brake ranks. It sends a very powerful message to insiders "we can bring anyone down no matter how rich or well known".

With a controlled exposure they had to protect the Elite, who are either part of the board of directors or still useful to them. So they arrange a theatrical display for the gullible publics consumption. Enter Lord Alistair McAlpine and the BBC orchestrated theatrical. They had no intention of arresting or prosecuting anyone on the protected list and the various 'inquiries' instituted around that time are designed to placate the public conscience and make it look as if they actually care about abused children. Which of course they do not!

This criminal organization has agents littered throughout the structures of British society, especially in the criminal justice system, local and national Government and the Police. But what they do not know is how many of their agents are infiltrators or double agents working to replace the existing organization with an alternative old style intelligence, group.

Insiders say "One thing you can reply on is their arrogance" It is this arrogance which will bring them down. Not everyone is prepared to believe their propaganda anymore. Millions of people are waking up to the truth. Pedophilia is not acceptable to use as a blackmail intelligence tool. Any person or organisation that can use the rape of children cynically and strategically is not fit to be in public office and in charge of public funds.

As the organizations size, power and madness grows it is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain the illusion that it is a force of law and order operating for the benefit of the UK and the public. Its cover stories are wearing thin and cracks are beginning to appear. Yesterday the IPCC called for a ban on Freemason police officers being involved in the Hillsborough investigation into the cover-up because of corruption concerns.

It is now time to restore sanity to our Police, Security and Intelligence services and have an Independent public Inquiry into the decades of child abuse cover-up. An Inquiry not headed by members of the damage limitation squad such as the judiciary or legal professionals but by whistle-blowers and those who have proven to be incorruptible."

Monday, 16 October 2017

Hazing, Cambridge Spies,the Impact of the Yale Fraternity Skull and Bones

Two related posts on Facebook.


How hazing works.
As part of Oxford hazing or some other ritual Cameron is meant to have had sex with a pig.
Whether true or not in this extreme form, obviously the person does not want this fact widely known, so his peers.Or those handling him have this over him. We do.not know the percentages but Greg Hallett says that most politicians are compromised in some serious way and he describes how the Clintons have a cottage for the purpose for world stage politicians.
This and other Google searchable articles describe the "networking advantages" of sororities and fraternities. From a third level Christian point of view this is advancement through cutting across the vertical alignment of relationship with God and superimposing the priority of horizontal relationships, and by it creating pathways and networks of relationships through all levels of society for all kinds of diabolical change without adherence to conscience.
This system is a milder form of the system adopted for raising children in Illuminati families, whose dynasties remain "pure" (to diabolical commitment) and date back to Greek civilisation and before. Counsellors now.refer to these practices as SRA or Satanic Ritual Abuse. Hazing is the much milder form but has also resulted in deaths and victims being grossly abused behaviourally psychologically or sexually.

March 6, 2014

Anne Mercuro, Samantha Merritt, Amanda Fiumefreddo [1]     Click on the linked names for the original thesis with tables. which have not been reproduced here.

College is a unique socialization experience. It’s the time when an individual is able to figure out who he or she is, as well as the type of friends he or she wants in his or her life. While Intramurals, clubs, athletics, and dorm-life are common ways of socializing, joining Greek-life –Fraternity or Sorority– is also popular among college students. Fraternities and sororities provide many benefits to students such as leadership opportunities, participation in college activities, friendships and extended connections with other chapters around the nation. Although popular, induction into Greek organizations has become a problem because of the practice of hazing. Hazing is defined as “…any activity, required implicitly or explicitly as a condition of initiation or continued membership in an organization, that may negatively impact the physical or psychological well-being of the individual or may cause damage to others, or to public or private property (Campo et. al., 2005, p. 137). According to Hoover and Milner (1998), “The attraction of hazing probably extends beyond the dictates of tradition, forging bonds through shared, secretive experiences. (The) rituals are thought to strengthen the group by proving the devotion of newcomers but also by helping to create a sense of loyalty” (p. 140). The effort to instill loyalty and devotion to the organization is pushed too hard sometimes. In essence, while fraternities and sororities offer a large social network for students and are beneficial to individuals’ growth, skills, and characteristics, hazing is a problem as it has negative consequences on an individual that simply strives to belong.

This paper studies hazing among Greek-organizations at a public liberal arts college in the Northeastern U.S. and its impact on individuals’ self-esteem. The paper proposes two hypotheses: first, individuals who experienced hazing will have lower self-esteem than those who have not experienced hazing; and second, fraternities haze more than sororities, based on personal observations in a small state college.

Perspectives on hazing
While membership in a Greek organization is typically seen in a positive light, some may wonder if the good outweighs the bad with respect to the potential risk of being hazed. Hazing is universally known as an initiation process that includes aggressive and harmful actions upon new members within Greek organizations, athletic teams and other types of clubs and activities. While hazing practices vary within organizations, there are some common hazing activities such as sleep deprivation, engaging in embarrassing behavior, drinking excessive amounts of alcohol, verbal and physical abuse, and much more (Cokley et al., 2001). These can impact a student negatively and hence it is important to be aware of potential negative implications.

Student attitudes about pledging
Social science research shows that hazing significantly influences people’s perspectives on Greek organizations, and has also affected new members both physically and cognitively. A number of researchers such as Cokley et al. studied the cognitive impact of hazing on students by surveying members and non members of organizations. For instance, Cokley et al. (2001) developed a Survey of Attitudes about Fraternities and Sororities (SAAP) to measure student perception about the role of pledging in Greek organizations. The survey focused on six factors that described attitudes towards Greek organizations: the purpose of pledging, the impact of pledging, conformity to pledging, rules, perceptions of Greek organizations, moral concerns, and beliefs about pledging difficulty.

The results of the survey showed that more females than males believed that pledging should be a positive experience. However, the results also showed that members of Greek organizations had a more positive view of Greek life and the pledging process in comparison to non-Greek students. The researchers concluded that “it is obvious that there are students who do value Greek letter organizations…likewise, it is apparent that when student’s perceptions of Greek letter organizations are uncritically positive, they become susceptible to hazing activities” (Cokley et al., 2001, par. 16). Hence, they argued that education about both the positive and negative aspects of Greek organizations should be given to all students, so that they can make a “fully informed decision about participation” (par. 16).

Similarly, Campo, Poulos, and Sipple (2005) studied how college students’ behaviors and beliefs correlated to hazing. They conducted a 20-minute web-based survey via e-mail using a random sample of 2,000 undergraduates. They used “specific questions on team-building and initiation activities (TBIs) and were derived from a national survey of college sports teams and university judicial board records” (p. 139). They found that drinking games and contests, as well as sleep deprivation, were the most commonly reported forms of hazing. Their results showed that students thought that hazing was in fact harmful, but they were neutral to their susceptibility to harm (p. 146). Campo et al.’s study concluded that “hazing is occurring on campus, although not always recognized as such by students” (p. 137).

Further, it has been observed that attitudes about hazing practices, especially alcohol overdose, may vary between fraternities and sororities. Drout and Corsono (2003) conducted an experimental study of student perceptions on alcohol overdose by placing them in hazing scenarios in a fraternity and sorority setting. The scenarios involved fraternities giving the students controlled and uncontrolled overdoses of alcohol consumption. Out of the 231 students, the 78 fraternity members within the study tended to view their fraternity president’s authority as not responsible for the outcome of involuntary alcohol consumption and viewed their brothers the same way. However, the 34 sorority members of the sample population took the scenarios more seriously. They felt more responsible for the overdose of alcohol consumption when the president was not involved. The researchers found that there were differences (not noted in the study) in beliefs on why overdoses occur among Greek and non-Greek individuals. Sororities and non-Greeks believe that it occurs because of a person’s need to be accepted into Greek-life, whereas fraternities believe that it occurs from a pledge’s over-willingness to please brothers. Overall, the researchers found that fraternities were more willing and accepting of alcohol overdose amongst the students than sororities or non-Greek students.

Another reason for hazing in organizations is group solidarity. Cimino (2011) studied hazing by surveying participants in strongly cooperative groups and weakly cooperative groups. He asked participants to picture themselves in high effort and low effort group activity and see if they were high or low contributors. The results were that participants desired more severe hazing in strong groups than in weak groups. In the second experiment he used the same model but improved the stimuli and removed threats to internal validity. In this experiment, participants were asked to focus on the benefits of “mutual group aid” (Cimino, 2011, p. 258). This group was found to desire more severe hazing in strong groups than in weak groups. Overall, these studies show that hazing is prevalent in Greek organizations and is practiced to maintain group solidarity. The practice can be harmful to its participants, though perceptions vary.

Impact of hazing on student self-esteem
Many cognitive processes could be negatively impacted due to hazing, such as self-esteem, moral and identity development. Though many students who decide to go through with the recruitment process perceive Greek organizations as beneficial, rarely do they consider the negative implications of hazing. Keating et al. (2005) state “striving to belong to a particular group, especially during ritualized initiations, may result in the justification of that effort, thereby inoculating individuals against any dissonant cognition they may harbor concerning the consequences of group membership” (p. 104). Especially when one is moving away from home for the first time, the idea of belonging and feeling accepted amongst one’s peers may triumph over any fears new pledges may initially face. While some may see the initiation process as harmful and overall negative, others may push aside this fear in order to actually raise their self-esteem and confidence amongst their peers. Through their study, however, Keating et al. (2005) found that both men and women who experienced “severe” induction activities were more likely to have an increased dependency on their fellow peers, feeling uncomfortable when left alone (p. 107).

Further, affiliation in Greek societies has no positive effects on individual identity. Kilgannon and Erwin’s (1992) study on the difference between non-Greek men and women’s moral and identity development vs. Greek men and women’s development showed that non-Greek men and women had higher self confidence. For instance, this study proved that non-Greek women had higher moral reasoning averages than Greek women. Also, Greek men scored lower confidence levels of identity development than non-Greek men. Grossbard et al. (2009) examined gender as a moderator of the association between contingent self-esteem and body image concerns, including weight and muscularity. Results of the study found that females reported higher levels of contingent self-esteem and greater concerns about their weight, although males reported a greater drive for muscularity.

Membership in Greek society undermines students’ self-esteem and this has other negative implications. For instance, it was seen that these students were pressured to live up to certain standards set by others to feel good about themselves. Liuna and Tao (2013) argue that acceptance in groups affects students’ self-esteem. The researchers believed that in the domain of academic competence and competition, contingencies of self-worth moderated the relationship between self-esteem and self-competence, and in the domains of appearance, family, virtue, and others’ approval, contingencies of self-worth moderated the relationship between self-esteem and self-liking. They defined contingencies of self-worth as “domains in which a person has based his or her self-esteem, such that perceived successes or failures in those domains greatly determine the person’s self-esteem state” (Liuna & Tao, 2013, p. 97). They concluded that individual importance is not the only means by which people satisfy their self-esteem needs.

The level of self-esteem impacted student misuse of alcohol, prejudices etc. Zeiger-Hill, Stubbs, and Madson (2013) claim that individuals who possess high levels of self-esteem consume less alcohol and experience fewer negative consequences than those with fragile self-esteem who relied on living up to certain standards in order to feel good about themselves. Crocker et al. (1987) stated that individuals who have lower self-esteem tend to be more prejudiced, for example in terms of failure feedback and derogation of members of out-groups. As a result, they concluded that individuals who had higher self-esteem would respond to threats to the self-concept by detracting from out-groups when group boundaries have evaluative implications.

These studies suggest that hazing affects student self-esteem and there are considerable differences between members of Greek societies. Based on the prior studies, we conducted research in a public liberal arts college to see who is most susceptible to hazing on campus and how hazing affects their self-esteem.

This study was conducted in order to investigate if members of fraternities are more likely to experience hazing than members of sororities and assess whether hazing has an effect on students’ self-esteem levels. The participants in this research completed an electronic survey. The survey was designed to assess students’ self-esteem levels and their perceptions of hazing.

Participants in the sample were undergraduate students from a public liberal arts college in the Northern U.S. The survey was constructed using Qualtrics Research Suite, an online survey software that allows students to collect and analyze the data they receive. The survey link was distributed through college e-mail and on a social media website group page. Seventy-eight surveys were collected and recorded.

The researchers used a non-probability sampling technique called convenience sampling because of accessibility and time factors. Convenience sampling allows for a quick and inexpensive recruitment of respondents, allowing the researchers to collect as much data as necessary for the study in a short amount of time. Due to this limitation, the respondents may not represent all subgroups within the college’s student population.

At the beginning of the survey, participants were given an informed consent form. Participants were made aware that the primary aim of the project was to explore predictors of self-esteem. Given the sensitive nature of this subject, it is important for participants to know that their responses remain anonymous. Before beginning the survey, they were informed that their participation in this research project was voluntary, that they were allowed to withdraw at any time. The informed consent form also provided a quick overview of what the survey questions entailed. Participants were asked to complete several demographic questions and were then asked to complete the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [RSES], in which they indicated their agreement or disagreement with each item (Sociology Department of University of Maryland, n.d). The paragraph also informed the participants that while there was no risk associated with their participation, if they had any questions or wished to receive the findings of the study, they would be able to contact the researchers. After submitting their responses, participants were then provided with a debriefing statement that informed them of the purpose of the study. Caution was also exercised with regards to ensuring that participants did not feel hurt or embarrassed, such cases were referred to the college’s counseling center.

After electronically signing the informed consent form, we asked demographic questions that assessed the participants’ gender, race, residential status, and involvement with Greek organizations. Following the demographic questions, RSES was implemented to evaluate students’ self-esteem. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with each question, varying from strongly agree to strongly disagree, without a neutral category. Regarding self-esteem, statements such as “I take a positive attitude toward myself” and “I feel that I am a person of worth, at least on equal plane with others” (isn’t this “an equal plane”) were included (Sociology Department of University of Maryland, n.d.). After the participants completed the RSES, they were presented with a scale that assessed their perceptions on harassment in general, with a few questions addressing hazing in particular. An example of a statement that addressed hazing was, “Even though hazing is a form of harassment, unless there is physical abuse, I would not consider it hazing” (Appendix A). For the final question of the survey, participants were given a list of different forms of harassment/abuse and were asked to check off the ones that they had experienced, with hazing being one of the choices.

Demographic profile
The research examined four characteristics: sex, race, residential status, and Greek affiliation. The sample consisted of 15 males (19%) and 63 females (81%) (Table 1). In regards to race, the sample consisted of 63 Caucasian participants (81%), 6 Latino or Hispanic participants (8%), 6 Asian or Pacific Islander participants (8%), 1 African American participant (1%), and 2 that classified themselves as “other” (3%) (Table 1). 53 participants live on campus (68%), and 25 participants are commuters (32%) (Table 1). As for Greek affiliation, 33 respondents are part of the college’s Greek Life, with 6 respondents belonging to a fraternity (8%) and 27 respondents belonging to a sorority (27%) (Table 2). 45 participants stated that they were not involved in any of the Greek organizations on campus (58%) (Table 2).

The objective was to examine if members of fraternities are more likely to experience hazing when compared to members of sororities. Also of interest was whether hazing has an effect on students’ self-esteem levels. The researchers expected that the data would reveal that fraternities were more likely to haze their members than sororities, and that those affiliated with Greek organizations would have lower self-esteem due to hazing. The participants responded to statements that assessed self-esteem and experiences with multiple forms of harassment, including hazing.

Respondents were presented with the RSES to assess their self-esteem (Appendix A). The ten questions consisted of five positive and five negative expressions of self-esteem. Respondents were asked to rate their responses from 1 to 4, with 1 being strongly agree and 4 being strongly disagree. For this research, the researchers decided to recode the positive expressions so that responses would be 1 to 4, but 1 would be strongly disagree and 4 would be strongly agree. Overall, the 33 participants that were affiliated with Greek organizations had a higher self-esteem (33.42), and the 45 participants who weren’t had lower self-esteem (31.55) (Table 5). However, those who belonged to fraternities had a self-esteem average of 30.83, which was the lowest average compared to those who belonged in sororities (34.0) and those who were not affiliated with Greek organizations (31.56) (Table 6).

In addition, respondents were also presented with a checklist where they were given eight possible forms of abuse and were asked to select all that applied to their personal experiences. The eight possible choices that the participants could have selected were hazing, physical abuse, verbal abuse, involuntary behavior, forced alcohol consumption, humiliation, intimidation, and/or feeling degraded (Appendix A). 65 of the respondents stated that they had not experienced hazing while 13 of the respondents stated that they had. Those who stated that they had not experienced hazing had a self-esteem average of 32.876, while those who said that they had experienced hazing had a self-esteem average of 29.692, signifying that those who had said that they had experienced hazing had a lower self-esteem. The data revealed a significant relationship among the variables (p = .039, p < .05) (Table 4).

Next, the researchers decided to do a cross tabulation between Greek Affiliation and the checklist that signified their experiences with various forms of abuse. When asked if they had experienced hazing, 83.3% of the participants selected that they had not experienced hazing, which included 83% of those who belonged to a fraternity, 63% of those who belonged to a sorority, and 65.6% of those who were not affiliated at all. Only 1 fraternity member (16.7%), 10 sorority members (37.0%), and 2 non-Greek members (4.4%) selected that they had experienced hazing, making up 16.7% of the participants (Table 7). When asked if the participants had experienced physical abuse, 85.5% of the sample stated that they had not, with 100% of fraternity respondents, 92.6% of sorority respondents, and 84.4% of non-Greek affiliated respondents all falling under this statistic. Only 11.5% of the sample stated that they had experienced physical abuse, with 7.4% of those respondents belonging to a sorority, and 15.6% respondents not belonging to a Greek organization (Table 9). However, one possible limitation was the chance that these experiences had not happened within their Greek activities.

Moreover, the numbers of respondents that experienced verbal abuse were much higher than those who had experienced physical abuse. Among those who selected that they had experienced verbal abuse, the majority was not affiliated with Greek organizations (66.7%). Sorority members had the second highest percentage of the sample that had experienced verbal abuse (40.7%), and fraternity members had the lowest percentage that had experienced verbal abuse (16.7%) (Table 8). Over 96% (consistency) of the sample stated that they had never experienced forced alcohol consumption, with 100% of both sorority and fraternity members stating that they had not experienced forced alcohol consumption, and only 6.7% of those that did not affiliate with Greek organizations stating that they had (Table 10). Also, only 11.5% of the sample stated that they had experienced involuntary behavior, with 16.7% of fraternity members, 14.8% of sorority members, and 8.9% of non-Greek members making up this statistic (Table 11).

However, those who had experienced both humiliation and intimidation were much more prevalent, with 32.1% of the sample experiencing humiliation and 44.9% of the population experiencing intimidation. Fraternity members and sorority members reported feelings of humiliation equally, both equaling 33.3% of their respective populations (Table 12). Nevertheless, more sorority members admitted to feelings of intimidation (48.1%) over those who belonged to a fraternity that had experienced intimidation (16.7%) (Table 13). There were more non-Greek affiliated respondents who had not experienced both humiliation (68.9%) and intimidation (53.3%) over those who did experience humiliation (31.1%) and intimidation (46.7%) (Tables 12 and 13).

Respondents that were not involved in any Greek organization had the highest percentage among those who felt degraded (28.9%), as opposed to those who belonged to a fraternity (16.7%) and those who belonged to a sorority (25.9%). Fraternity members had the highest amount of respondents that stated that they did not feel degraded by others (83.3%), compared to those that belonged in a sorority (74.1%) and those that were not Greek affiliates (71.1%) (Table 14).

The results show that the overall self-esteem of those who belong to Greek organizations was higher on average (33.42) than those who were not affiliated (31.55) (Table 5). However, fraternity members had the lowest overall self-esteem score (30.88), compared to sorority members’ overall self-esteem (34.0) and non-Greek affiliates self-esteem (31.556) (Table 6). The survey also showed that those who had not been hazed had a higher self-esteem with a self-esteem average of 32.876 and those who had been hazed had a self-esteem average of 29.692 (Table 4). Only one fraternity member, ten sorority members, and 2 non-Greek members admitted to being hazed (Table 7).

In studies that had more male participants, such as Drout and Corsono’s (2003) research, many researchers find that fraternities are more accepting of alcohol overdose amongst the students than sororities or non-Greek students. This is due to fraternities’ beliefs that indulgence in alcohol will eventually lead to acceptance and approval from their Greek brothers. Due to the present study’s lack of male participants, the current results found that only 6.7% of the respondents admitted to being pressured into drinking alcohol, none of whom belonged to a Greek organization. These findings also differ from Glindemann et al.’s (1999) study. Glindemann et al. (1999) found that there was a distinct correlation between college students’ levels of self-esteem and their consumption of alcohol; this has relied on self-reported measures of alcohol use.

The current study’s results also differ from Keating et al.’s (2005) research. Keating et al. (2005) found that both men and women who experienced severe induction activities were more likely to have an increased dependency on their fellow peers, feeling uncomfortable being left alone. The present research results found that fraternity members had the lowest overall self-esteem score and that if one had not been hazed then he or she typically had a higher self-esteem average. These findings correlate with the researchers’ original hypothesis that fraternities are more likely to haze than sororities and that hazing would have a negative impact on self-esteem. However, the findings did not reveal that hazing was the leading cause of low levels of self-esteem, with only 16.7% of the sample admitting to experiencing hazing.

While fraternities seemed to be having the lowest levels of self-esteem, the findings show that Greek members collectively had higher levels of self-esteem. As Keating et al. (2005) stated “striving to belong to a particular group, especially during ritualized initiations, may result in the justification of that effort, thereby inoculating individuals against any dissonant cognition they may harbor concerning the consequences of group membership” (p. 104). Especially when one is moving away from home for the first time, the idea of belonging and feeling accepted amongst one’s peers may triumph over any fears new pledges may initially face. So while some may see the initiation process as harmful and negative, others may be pushing aside this fear in order to actually raise their self-esteem and confidence amongst their peers.

Similar to the current study, Campo, Poulos, and Sipple (2005) conducted a web-based survey using a random selection of 2000 undergraduates. Their goal was to see college students’ attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs on hazing. Their survey results showed that students thought that hazing was in fact harmful, but they were impartial to their vulnerability to harm. They concluded, “hazing is occurring on campus, although not always recognized as such by students” (Campo et. al, 2005, p. 137).

Social science research on hazing is limited to a few campuses. It will be interesting to broaden this by surveying students across North America and see how results differ from college to university as well as state to state. While it is apparent that hazing is an issue within every college, assessing more schools in various states would help determine if hazing is prevalent among specific universities and/or states. Future research on the prevalence of hazing among Greek organizations and its influence on self-esteem should further inquire about hazing processes and aim to collect more specific information about the participants’ experiences during the hazing processes.

Cambridge Spies

The other Key to understanding main universities and recent war history:
Hazing,homosexuality,psychological profiling, the fact that at their pinnacles all spy networks worldwide were formed under House of Rothschild, Templars,Jesuit orders and the occult networks.
So the missing links that BBC never were
That single agents,double agents,triple agents are meaningless terms in a homogenous block of security agencies.
That of course Blunt and so many others were homosexual and from Cambridge and Oxford.(Before legalisation 1967 and therefore highly subject to blackmail)
Were they committing treason per se? Anything the above organisations put their finger on is treasonous, they don't believe in Sovereign states, they believe in Luciferian globalism.
Prove it?
One now open fact as revealed in Shutter Island with Leo DiCaprio is Operation Paperclip, or the secret transfer of all top Nazi intelligentsia to American Society, not only for rocket research, but to establish the CIA and psychowarfare research, the same research that Hitler was already using, and to establish the great media brainwashing tools that we have today. Yes Hollywood is crawling with former Nazi propagandists as is Washington. Names were changed but their Deep State ideologies are.the same today.  End of Spy section.

The Yale and Skull and Bones Fraternity Connection

The 15 Most Powerful Members (We think) of the Skull and Bones Society
More information about how devastating his role was is given in Rooseveld's Summary of the Conspiracy to takeover America

Averill Harriman (Skull and Bones, class of 1915) was Secretary of Commerce, Governor of New York, and director of Guaranty Trust while it financed Hitler during WWII, and also while it financed Masons Lenin and Trotsky triggering the Russian Revolution.

Shortly after being accused of war crimes, he was serendipitously appointed US Ambassador to the Soviet Union. The Harriman’s were always known as diehard “Democrats” but very close friends of the “Republican” Bush family; Prescott Bush even called Averill Harriman his mentor.

Averill Harriman’s wife, Pamela, was later appointed US Ambassador to France by Bill Clinton after she helped finance his presidential campaign. Throughout Pamela’s love life she stayed very close to the Brotherhood. She was married to both Skull and Bones, Nazi financier Averill Harriman and Randolph Churchill, the son of Britain’s Committee of 300, 33rd degree Masonic Prime Minister Winston Churchill.

She also had affairs with bloodline/Illuminati agents Giovanni Agnelli and Baron de Rothschild. see more here

Rockefeller paid for a Cathedral to instal "his modernist rubbisher of the supernatural" Harry Fosdick to preach in. He then got it publicised through his own Freemason stooge and agent the editor of Time magazine Henry Luce. All documented by Dietrich Bonhoeffer while in America studying.

Blackstone Investments are closely linked with the recent history of Serco, first selling them then buying some of it back recently.. Who are Serco?

Sunday, 15 October 2017

Gaia's Protocol sales pitch and the Ruach of God

Features names in my friend's list on Facebook where it was a status

Below is a sales link about oxygen therapy selling info at 39 dollars.
if this link is taken down go to the core gaiasprotocolDOTCOM site and hopefully there will be another link

It's full of tidbits tho. I never knew Dr Atkins of Atkins diet got himself struck off in the 60s over oxygen therapy. He got himself reinstated but had to agree never to mention this stuff again.... and the rest is history with his protein Weightloss stuff.
It's not that it doesn't work, oxygen therapy threatens the pill industry by boosting the body's own immune system.... usual Big Pharma tale.
But I was thinking how the Holy Spirit is our oxygen therapy cure all, our Ruach Hebrew for breath.
Hermann Loubser Snr was saying when we discuss our nature we can't really use anything other than soul or body since we have nothing else really to go on.
David Heisler is currently doing a series on our " human nature"and discussing the Norman Grubb point of " no independent human nature".
We are not self existent gods.
My thoughts today recall baptism in the Spirit.
Nothing changes outwardly.
My soul doesn't change and quietly slip another soul in its place.
But this Ruach that filled and fills my being in varying levels is a layer of me that is not terrestrial and measurable like a piece of thin plastic film wedged between my inner skin layers....and discoverable with a microscope, though it almost feels that way.
As Daniel Yordy writes, it's not like Spirit is some kind of pea shaped object rattling around my middle.... what baptism in the Spirit really released is that every bit of me in the natural seems to have a spiritual counterpart that now seeks to drive my whole being .
Indeed Romans 12.1 describes it as a whole body/ soul offering, set on fire by the altar of Gods burning coals....
Yet all this and I look no different and sometimes don't feel different.
Paul even says to Timothy " stir up that gift within you" when you are not thinking or perceiving difference.
Like oxygen therapy Ruach or the other picture Living Water translates all that Christ won for me in eternity into my day to day life. " all that pertains to life and godliness"
"I am complete in Christ"
Oxygen empowers my cells to seek out and destroy disease, cancer, tumours.... anything that upsets my homeostatic balance, insulin levels in diabetes, fat levels in the blood.
The Holy Spirit releases the 9 fruit of the Spirit.
But here's another mystery: the things we do.
Just as our bodies are products ofthe things we eat : Masai traditionally drunk the milk and blood of cows and ate cows meat and are tall and thin and walk for miles or run for miles.
The mystery is that what a person has done in the flesh becomes an invisible but perceptible part of their makeup.
Something about the hours and hours of piano tuning I have done over 36 years will be perceptible to you.
For Ilona Smith it will be all the hours nursing she has done.
Military people have a gait and a bearing.
In that sense and our own unique personalities we have an individual nature. Somehow when we are with each other we can sense these different levels in each other.
But no.... nearly nothing is visible per se. Just the marks left by our tracks.
As Jesus said.... you can't tell the wind by looking, just by what it's blowing.

Saturday, 14 October 2017

Taking the L Plates off

We have a little sister, and her breasts are not yet grown. What shall we do for our sister on the day she is spoken for? If she is a wall, we will build towers of silver on her. If she is a door, we will enclose her with panels of cedar.
I am a wall and my breasts are like towers
Thus I have become in his eyes one that bringeth contentment
Song of Songs 8
No more do I call you disciples but friends
Both the one who makes people holy and those who are made holy are of the same family. So Jesus is not ashamed to call them brothers and sisters. He says, “I will declare your name to my brothers and sisters; in the assembly I will sing your praises.”
Hebrews 2
We have "two little sisters "in the world and they look really weird. Each has one breast.
In the Spirit breasts are the two sides of faithfulness..... faith and faithfulness, love and trust.
Evangelicals, having cast aside direct Holy Spirit tools to get them out of messes, have enormous amounts of trust.
Charismatics have, especially collectively, enormous mountain moving faith. As they join together in prayer, worldly decisions suddenly get reversed, illnesses are healed, people get deliverance.
But walking around onebreastedly looks really weird.
The true Church is at home with all 12 Gates of Jerusalem, not just the ones associated with either faith or trust.

Friday, 13 October 2017

Did we inherit a sin nature?

Then God said, “Let the earth sprout vegetation.....and God saw that it was good
"Consider the lilies, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin; but I tell you, not even Solomon in all his glory clothed himself like one of these.
Kay Fairchild is writing " we did not inherit sin from Adam....or more exactly...Adam's sin nature"
This is very interesting from the point of view of our "seeing".
I am convinced by my own life experience, Bible Knowledge and then reading Norman Grubb later in 1989....
that we DID inherit Adam's sin nature
BUT not how you think
Not how Augustine thinks
Not how Catholics think
Not how any Catholic derivatives TULIP (Calvinists)
You see in my Bible we don't have a nature.
Other than as, Kay says, and Andre Rabe says, God
Read Norman Grubb "Yes I am " to see the things we can DO as humans....and then read what we can't do.
But the main gist is this
Our identity isn't what you think it is
What you think it is....was put there as a delusion by the god of this world. See Ephesians 2 and 1 Corinthians 12 verse 1
No our REAL identity...and here Kay and Andre and Francois all agree....our real identity is spirit. At least i hope we agree, because any Buddhist will tell you that.
Westerners have one more layer of deception to wade through than easterners who are already halfway there.
What we call US isn't......
That's just surface stuff. It's what I call "front of house".
It's like calling a butler the Lord of the Manor. That's the stupid daily error every Westerner this side of planet earth does daily.
Take the breath of life at a spirit level from out of your trouser leg, or hairy armpits.....(and that's just the modern women!!!)
you can have as much soul as you much as James Brown...
So when I use the phrase "inherit Adam's sin nature", I am different from Augustine....because he believes in the independent self.
I KNOW by virtue of living during a different time period and now catching up with St Paul....
we don't have an independent nature of our own....
The Deity of our choice.
What Kay and I agree on is that Adam didn't even become evil
And therefore a baby can't inherit evil and become evil.
But we believe that for two absolutely diametrically opposite reasons.
As far as I can read of anything Kay writes, she has not yet seen what Bob Dylan sang and became somewhat ostracised straight away for when he joined Chuck Smith's church and did the album
Slow Train Coming.
He sang "You gotta serve somebody" which is the essence of Paul's whole gospel.
Graham Pulkingham and the Fisherfolk were trying to share this as well, and try as we might we just couldn't see what they were saying.
If we have a nature at the Spirit.
It is a clay vessel ready to be filled with the substance....GLORY or SHEKINAH or GOD'S ESSENCE.
we have this treasure in earthen vessels.
But as soon as we change our "inner seeing" and that is where the devil "opened our eyes" to look unto falsehood....
as soon as we change our innermost settings to read
independent god strutting round the universe.....
far from being a free clay pot moving from place to place, we switch over to Adam's stupid inner believing of being
AN ALONE - I in the universe.....
The devil honestly believes that.
But we as "pots" as spirit containers can never be that....
and the devil knew that....
and his essence, his nature -his spirit has been empowering us secretly ever since.
But the devil's life, as much as it is twisted in self centredness, still is a creature/ a creation of God / derives from God.
What people used to call "our natural man, or natural life" still has God in. That's been the major confusion for all these millennia.
So King Cyrus was it(?), donated all the materials for God's temple to David and Solomon. The Kings in Babylon actually sent Nehemiah and Ezra back to Jerusalem.
Not even Hitler was totally totally evil. Just look at his family films.
(Actually just like the Illuminati and today's politicians, the earth's controller's had "stuff" on Hitler....his love of scatalogical sex. So all a "ruler " had to say in secret to Hitler either kill those Jews or we will tell the world about you.
When Bill Clinton wouldn't pass secrets on to Mossad, they sent in Monica Lewinsky a Mossad spy, and the rest is history)
NO.....when the Bible says we inherit the nature of sin from Adam,
that is precisely what it means.....
Now there is no leftbrain way of showing others. Just as I hadnt a clue what Graham Pulkingham was saying nor Bob Dylan....
Until you have been shredded in some kind of Romans 7 experience you cannot know what Paul means by the phrase
"sin in the flesh".
What a leftbrain driven person hears is
"The devil made me do it."
So if we broke that down into an image....
the leftbrain understanding of that statement is
me or you, an independent being, is being bullied by an either fantasy or actual big bully spirit person to do something.
The Spirit reality is
YOU or ME the bucket
or let's say electric kettle with a lead plugged into a socket
Or perhaps a glove puppet
Need something in the container to function, need electricity to be powered, need an arm up our bum to move....
and horror of horrors.....that spirit empowering our so called independence....was SATAN.....was the POWER of sin in our flesh.......when all the time I thought it was just me.
Boy it takes a lot of words writing to leftbrains....
In the Spirit you get this instantly.
you cannot inherit a block of evil from Adam and then be totally evil....because you cannot be ANYTHING in your own right.
You can only be empowered by the NATURE of the particular one you choose.
You cannot ever be Good or goodness....There is only one who is good...Jesus said....My Father in heaven.
But you as an empty vessel cannot BE anything.
Show More Reactions
2 Nick Cabbiness and Paul Noble
Paul Noble
Paul Noble Interested in your comment. In Adam we are essentially soulish. Adam became a living soul. My experience is in Christ we became alive. Our spirit which is Christ is our identity
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 27 mins
Chris Welch
Chris Welch well I am really saying we may have thought we were soulish but all along , while strutting around godlike we were Satanish
Soulish is a delusional state which is why Pentecostal theology is so crap.
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 23 mins
Paul Noble
Paul Noble My understanding would be that our spirit is our essential being? Soul is a bit like the memory and processor part of a computer. The spirit is the ghost in the machine!
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 21 mins
Chris Welch
Chris Welch Well Hebrews 4 puts it this way....
The Word is a double edged sword so sharp that itt is able to discern the thoughts and INTENTIONS of the heart, cutting to divide and separate soul from spirit , joints from marrow....See more
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 12 mins · Edited
Paul Noble
Paul Noble That's why Spirit and soul looks alike. That's maybe the difference between the gift of prophecy and a clairvoyant
LikeShow More Reactions · Reply · 13 mins
Chris Welch
Chris Welch The phrase we ( union crowd) use is masquerade.
Satan masquerades as "just us"
Many choose sex in the back of the car but don't intend for the illegitimate pregnancy and raising the child for the rest of their life. But Satan planned the whole thing masquerading as us from the first drive to the hidden spot.
Then from outside us commands his condemnation department to tell us what a complete lowlife we if we were independent beings.

Thursday, 12 October 2017

Invest 50 Minutes!!! Doug Addison and Graham Cooke in Conversation

Non Christians should hear this.
Former Christians should hear this.
Evangelicals , you will feel happy with this uncomplicated straight down the line message.
Charismatics you will like this, it is dense with gems.
Thirdlevellers you will like this in the same way that so many appreciated Paul Anderson-Walsh Linda Bunting and DeeDee Winter sharing so matter of factly the other month.
This is really what the internet is for.
Invest 50 minutes and I guarantee you will want this to go viral.
Doug Addison and Graham Cooke
Click to Access the audio on Doug's page

DeeDee Winter & Linda Bunting Special Event - Wednesday 21st June 2017

Monday, 25 September 2017

Our Condition - Kay Fairchild,Michael Daniel via Cindi Estep, Chris Welch

Christine in the Vaulted Ceilings of New Forest Trees
Sin is described as a mystery- the mystery of sin. I find what Kay is seeing challenging.
You see....the Adamic is a lie...and infection...a way of seeing that is just false...
but that said it still requires the sword of the Spirit which has two edges....
one side brings down the high place falsehoods....the fact that we are not independent gods
the other side raises up the valley thoughts, the depressions , the uslessnesses, the lousy feelings....(a bruised reed He shall not break)
I put these different sides of truth to you for weighing

Kay Fairchild

20 September at 00:09 · Fort Wayne, IN, United States ·
There are several teachings that have brought much condemnation and confusion to the body of Christ, which are: Penal Substitution Atonement (PSA), Eternal Conscious Torment (ECT), and Inherited Sin Nature (ISN), from the 'fall' of Adam. We are currently doing a series entitled: Our Eternal Identity which shows that we were never separate from the Father; only in OUR MINDS did we think that we were separate, because of 'wicked works' according to Colossians 1:21. Ephesians 2:3 also records that we THOUGHT we were children of wrath, IN OUR MIND.
The early Church fathers never embraced or taught Penal Substitution, Eternal Conscious Torment, or that we inherited a sin nature from Adam's disobedience. The teaching of inherited 'original sin' began with the Jewish people believing that they were 'conceived in iniquity and born in sin'. The Catholic Church continued to teach the idea of original sin, and Augustine in the 4th century A.D. propagated that message, with John Calvin in the 16th century advancing the idea even further.
The thing which I find sad is that today many 'gracers' and 'finished work' believers still believe in an inherited sin nature, as did I did myself a few years ago. Grace is not fully embraced when we believe such an idea. For many years I ministered the idea of 'original sin' being inherited from Adam's fall, and taught that Jesus had to go to the Cross to take me out of Adam, fix me, and put me back into Himself. Jesus went to the Cross to REVEAL the love of the Father, so we could 'receive' Redemption, salvation and inheritance. The word 'receive' means: To take that which is one's OWN. We then can walk in, or experience who we have ALWAYS been. It was ours' all along. Salvation, redemption and inheritance is a discovery of what IS. The term 'born again' means in Aramaic: To remember our beginning.
Truth, if it is really the truth, never changes. It was, is, and always will be the truth. The truth about our identity and nature has never changed, but has remained what the Father declared it to be from before time began. He declared the end from the beginning according to the prophet Isaiah. Ecclesiastes 3:14 tells us that 'what God does is forever, and nothing can be added or taken away from it'. What does it mean when the Scripture refers to eternal redemption, eternal inheritance or eternal salvation? Does it merely mean that God had 'a plan' from before time, knowing that Adam would do what he did in infecting us with a 'sin nature'? If so, then Jesus was God's plan 'B' because plan 'A' failed. No, it is much deeper than that. We were eternally saved according to Ephesians 1:4 and II Timothy 1:9. We were eternally redeemed according to Hebrews 9:12. We had an eternal inheritance according to Hebrews 9:15. The problem was that we FORGOT that reality when we came here, because of mind conditioning and religion; but the incarnation reminded us once again of the eternal truth. Let us not forget that the Holy Spirit leads us into all truth and brings back to our REMEMBRANCE what we knew, but had forgotten.
Let me give a few Scripture passages concerning this reality. Psalm 58:3 records: The wicked are estranged from the womb: THEY GO astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies." Notice that 'they GO astray', they are not born astray. In Matthew 18:3 Jesus said that to experience the kingdom of heaven one must be converted and become as a little child. In other words, one must experience the pureness of little children, who are obviously without a sin nature. Colossians 3:25 records that 'HE that does wrong shall receive for the wrong which HE has done, for there is no respect of persons'. That reminds me of the Ezekiel 18:4 verse that says that the 'soul that sinneth, IT, (or, he/she) shall die'. This is not the result of inheriting Adam's sin nature, but because of his OWN mistaken identity, which is carnal thinking and IS death; which then leads to behavioral transgressions/sins. Now what Ezekiel 18:1-4 records is that the people were quoting a proverb saying that 'The fathers' ate the sour grapes, and it set the childrens' teeth on edge'. Meaning that the children inherited the sin that the father's committed. However, God told them that this proverb was untrue and not to be spoken anymore. He said in verse 3: "As I live, you will no longer USE this proverb." Then in verse 20 He summarizes this rule by saying: "The soul that sinneth, IT shall die. The son shall NOT bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon HIM, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon HIM." How could it be any plainer? According to Ecclesiastes 7:29 we came here UPRIGHT, but sought out many inventions. The word 'inventions' means: To think; To reckon and to have vain imaginations about our uprightness. In other words, it means to think that we inherited Adam's sin, and were in Adam, needing to be taken OUT of him (Adam) at the Cross.
Now in Psalm 51:5 is where David said that he was 'conceived in iniquity and born in sin' which was after he had his ordeal with Bathsheba. It sounds like he, in some Bible translations, was saying that he inherited his mother's sin nature which would be totally inconsistent with what we see in Ezekiel 18. Then in Psalm 22:9-10 he goes to the other extreme saying: "But thou art he that took me out of the womb: thou didst make me hope when I was upon my mothers' breasts. I was cast upon thee from the womb: THOU ART MY GOD FROM MY MOTHER'S BELLY." So which is it? Was David 'conceived in iniquity and born in sin', or did he come out of God from his birth? Was he the offspring of God as we all are, or did he inherit his mother's sin nature, or even Adam's sin nature?
Now there are 2 verses which I want to read in tandem and see the actual meanings of both: Romans 5:12 records: "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, FOR (or because) THAT ALL HAVE SINNED." In other words, Adam INTRODUCED sin into the world, (mistaken identity), and the resulting transgression was committed because he thought he could 'DO' something to be like God, and he experienced death. However, most do not read the last part of the verse which says that: 'death passed upon all men FOR, OR BECAUSE THEY ALL SINNED'. It was not that Adam's sin became OUR sin, as in receiving an 'inherited sin nature', but mankind sinned because of their OWN mistaken identity, which then led to outward sinful behavior. Sin 'ENTERING into the world' is not the same as one inheriting a sin nature or identity from Adam's transgression. Now let us connect that verse with James 1:14-15 which records: "But EVERY MAN is tempted, when HE is drawn away of HIS OWN LUST, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death." Doesn't that remind us of Ezekiel 18:3 which states that the 'soul (itself-- my addition for emphasis) that sins, IT shall die'? Another verse which clearly shows this is Romans 3:23 which says, "For all HAVE sinned, and come short of the glory of God." The word 'HAVE' infers activity on EVERY INDIVIDUALS' part, not an inherited sin nature from Adam. God made man in HIS image after HIS likeness, and gave MAN dominion. So what we see in James 1 is that 'EVERY MAN' and 'HIS OWN LUST' brings death, not 'inherited sin' as a result of Adam's fall. Let us carefully think these things through, rather than taking what we have always believed in the past as the Gospel Truth. Other Verses of Scripture in the Old Testament that show these wonderful realities are Jeremiah 31:27-30 and Deuteronomy 24:16. Then in the New Testament, Galations 6: 5 records that 'EVERY MAN shall bear HIS OWN burden'. Mistaken identity is the problem, not a corrupted nature or Adamic identity. The problem lies 'between the ears' in the heart awareness. That is where the issues of life are released from. We must 'put on' the Mind of Christ and see from that perspective, rather than from 'man whose breath is in his nostrils'. (This teaching will be available as a youtube presentation in a couple of weeks). #KayFairchild

Cindi Estep

6 mins ·
The worst that happens to those who are truly seeking God is that they are in an almost constant state of despair. It is not depression. It goes much deeper than that and the ones that experience it can't put a finger on why it is happening or explain it and when they try to, most people think they're crazy. This is what St. John of the Cross calls the Dark Night of the Soul and it is real and terrifying. It is God's great expurgation at work in His chosen children.
Many speak of the refining fire of God as if it is a birthday party in the park. In reality the refining fire of God literally burns the hell out of you and is the most excruciatingly painful experience anyone could imagine.
It is a dangerous and deceptive business to paint a rosy and easy picture of the journey in Christ. Two of the greatest examples of God's pathway are Job and Jesus Himself. Why should a good and perfect man and the Son of the Living God not be spared suffering and we expect to be? Jesus says it is simple but He never says it is easy.
To travel the road of Christ and to truly know Him, the Father and the Holy Spirit we are purposed by God to trod that very same narrow road. But as you have heard me say many times, don't believe one single word I write or say. The Holy Spirit is within you.
What is God's best for us? Is it not the what and where of the very moment? from God's Best For You by Michael Daniel
Chris Welch:
Jesus came to His own. The Jews.
But His ministry began afresh. yes they had the old Covenant.
Yes they had an outer courts relationship with "God up there",
but His mandate was to teach "Emmanuel" "The Kingdom of heaven is at hand"
To teach God making for Himself a Home, a footstool, a Living Temple.....
To complete the Tabernacle blue print
To complete the Feasts Blue print. That was what He was saying in John 7 at the Major Feast....
That's what He was saying at the First the Passover discourse. "Hey....THIS by the way is MY BODY....the wine that you drink....MY BLOOD"
Then in Pentecost He instructed the disciples to wait in Jerusalem without actually specifying Pentecost.
( It seems they fulfil best when we have the least knowledge of it beforehand!!!!!)
But BEFORE Jesus teaching course ever began properly, Jesus qualified His disciples....both the closest, the 12, and the other 120 or so....
and He did this at the start.
5 When Jesus saw the crowds, He went up on the [a]mountain; and after He sat down, His disciples came to Him. 2 He opened His mouth and began to teach them, saying,
3 “[b]Blessed are the [c]poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.
5 “Blessed are the [d]gentle, for they shall inherit the earth.
6 “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.
7 “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.
8 “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.
9 “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.
10 “Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 “Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
Are you and I on the same page.
Some are saying all kinds of weird dispensational things....
Oh that was for the Jews....
well yes, they were at least prepared as had been God's plan...
But guess what? We in the Gentile nations are approximately where the Jews are when Jesus turned up. We have had the Kingdom leaven in its "outer courts form" like they, for around 2000 years.
That is we have had synagogue type gathering places at which instructional type material has been spoken, and we have had rabbi type figures that call themselves priests, curates, pastors, vicars.....
But now Jesus is turning up again on the large global scale, and saying have been told it is the end of Christianity....but actually it is the END of OUTERCOURTS Christianity.....
And now for my course, here is my filter, my "qualification" not of goodness...but desire....but readiness...a preparedness for the type of things that will undergo you as I install Myself into your life.

Dean Dosherisms

Dean Dosher
throw your dice...fondle your prayer your horoscope...
then be honest...your not special until all are...then you understand...
Kirk Stephens
It's not Paradise until it is Paradise for all.
See heaven yet?
Chris Welch
That's what thirdlevel Christianity is.
Jesus Christ is not content with " forgiving folk"
He is not content with giving " powers" to folk so that they can be distracted from their orphanhood.
The reason everything is taking so long is that He is reproducing a multitude exactly like Him. It is daft. The whole proposition is crazy. Most people are still waiting for a rapture in America.
Buddhists think they are doing the same sort of thing by meditating, but they can bring no sword.
Jesus came to bring a sword. He came to lay the axe to the root.
The root isn't intellectual faith or atheism
The root isn't colour of skin
Or parentage
The root can't even be seen by anybody unless God shines His Light.
But in His Light we see Light
And there remains no Darkness at all. That is the kingdom of heaven on earth.
Not a doctrine.
A being.
A Being.

Monday, 18 September 2017

Looking at the devil but with a "single eye"

If your eye is single your body shall be full of Light.
Who would have thought that pretty much all of Christianity on earth would hinge on this weird obscure phrase tucked in the gospels?
Who has even understood it until this age? Jacob Boehme and Madame Guyon and St Francis maybe? And they burned Guyon.
When Jesus said
Now is the Son of Man glorified and the ruler of this world shall be cast out.
But then added .... the devil is coming for me but he has nothing in me...
Guess what facebookers and Romans 3 to 5ers.....
Jesus was doing all that with a single eye
In the same way that we in Him do in these days. We look fully at what the devil is doing and how he is doing it
But with a single eye....
What does a single eye look like?
It means staring straight at Pontius Pilate , saying very little but....
You would have no power over me but that my Father in heaven give it to you...
That's the single eye right there....
Not the Preterist or Gracebook
There is no devil
Or it has all been completed in 70AD
That's not the single eye
That's Stanley Kubricks Both "Eyes wide shut"
And let me tell you why that is dangerous
Because as we saw with the first and second world wars and then Vietnam....
The enormity of what the devil can do through compliant men is so enormous, whole generations worldwide are still atheist because of the godless shock.
This is why I am so angry with Facebookers in this relatively peaceful lull in the are sowing lies that result in a whole generation of more people unprepared and yet worse atheism and despair as a result.
You look upon appearances.... I look upon the result of your false spirit by which you write and condemn it utterly.

Saturday, 16 September 2017

Flat Earth - Where are we now?

Here are two of the most recent videos picked randomly for me by Youtube.
I had an odd experience the other day with a female I know who blocked my very explanation of what I was doing.
  • Although this whole subject seems too ludicrous to even post , it is at these the extreme borders of our knowledge that some extremely interesting points are raised, and this is what exploring is about
  • 100 years ago two men raised a lot of opposition and ridicule that humans could fly and set about proving it
  • In the following decades rocketry would be researched and used in warfare, and then for exploration
  • who would even have thought that "flat earth " could ever raise its head again? We have been to the moon? or have we? How weird that all the footage of the space mission is now conveniently absent from Nasa's film archive. Whaaaaaat?
  • Is the online furore just literally Tavistock Institute hotair deliberately injected into online media to help the Elite study our "compliance levels" or "manipulation levels"?Have they been using Sargent and Eric Dubay just as their agents all along?
  • it doesn't matter which way you look at the entire controversy, that it could even be raised and sustained for over 2 years seems absolutely incredible
  • but unlike virtually any other question nothing on earth matches the polarisation factor surrounding this topic.
  • Certainly to have the female all but duct tape me to the wall rather than say what I have said here flagged up  a much greater interest for me than the subject itself.
  • Bear in mind that at 13 I went from knowing that miracles didn't exist to knowing that I could participate in them. This is such a psychological switch, does this make me less terrified to be absolutely prepared for either reality to be true here? have I come to the point where I simply don't trust anything through any channel unless it is firmly corroberated and all questions answered?
  • One of the stated goals of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was that they should create "consternation" across the planet deliberately (5.10)
Page 17 of 54Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
11. The second secret requisite for the success of our government is comprised in the following: To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. THERE IS NOTHING MORE DANGEROUS THAN PERSONAL INITIATIVE: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the GOYIM communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence. The strain which results from freedom of actions saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collision arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments, failures. BY ALL THESE MEANS WE SHALL SO WEAR DOWN THE "GOYIM" THAT THEY WILL BE COMPELLED TO OFFER US INTERNATIONAL POWER OF A NATURE THAT BY ITS POSITION WILL ENABLE US WITHOUT ANY VIOLENCE GRADUALLY TO ABSORB ALL THE STATE FORCES OF THE WORLD AND TO FORM A SUPER-GOVERNMENT.
In place of the rulers of to-day we shall set up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government Administration. Its hands will reach out in all directions like nippers and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.