Tuesday 14 October 2014

Briars 9 - America : Rockefeller Foundation.Kinsey, the Fosdick Brothers,and A=440

This Blogpost makes no attempt to link the information from five separate sources, but asks for mature readers to draw their own conclusions from the information. This is the type of work we must now be involved in as we desperately seek to unravel the truth about all our history. The central core of history has been hidden very deliberately from us in order to create the illusion of a rather random secular world of disparate good and evil events. This simply is not so, although ofcourse the earth is filled also with completely different races of people, who even within one nation have many and competing agendas. However, to exclude the plans and achievements of the hidden Bloodlines simply because they own all the main media outlets and simply edit themselves out of view, this all has to come to an end, lest we be drawn into a world completely of their design, and one which nobody else wishes to be a part of. This is the reason for this Briars series.

THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION: It’s Illuminati power & its corruption.    by Fritz Springmeier   Facebook article  12/10/2014

This post will teach you more on HOW the Illuminati control decisions & life in the USA by the Rockefeller Foundation, and exposes its connections to the Ebola outbreak & pedophilia. The Illuminati has almost countless tax-free foundations in America…the Rockefeller Foundation is one of the big 3 (Ford, Carnegie & Rock. Foundations) that work in tandem w/ interlocking leadership.
PEDOPHILIA MASKED AS SCIENCE. In 1921, 8 yrs. after J.D. Rockefeller, Sr. (an Illum. mmbr) started the Rockefeller Foundation (hencefore referred to RF in this article for brevity sake), the RF set up the Committee on Research in Problems of Sex. This Committee worked under the National Research Council, w/ R. M. Yerkes (NRC leader) as Chairman of the Committee. The RF over the years used both the NRC as a conduit, as well direct grants to sponsor the sexual research of Alfred C. Kinsey (1894-1956). An example of using NRC as a conduit, in 1946, the RF gave NRC a $120,000 grant specifically earmarked for Kinsey. On 9/3/43, after talking one on one w/ RF’s head, Dr. Gregg, Kinsey crowed, “As an outcome of our conference, Dr. Gregg assured me that the Rockefeller Foundation would support our work on an unlimited scale for an indefinite time.” Rockefeller grants allowed Kinsey to be generous w/ employees. Kinsey became famous to the public as an “anthropologist studying human sexuality”. He came out with a stream of reports & research about deviant sexuality, and any aspect of sex imaginable. He helped changed American sexual values & mores.
What was hidden was that Kinsey became increasingly perverted, for instance S&M. In 1939, he told close assoc. that he was 50-50 bisexual, but by 1946, he viewed himself as 2/3’s homosexual. Worse, as time went on, he got increasingly into pedophilia, using his experiences to write reports, & in the 50’s began defending it. He said that if society did not make a big deal over pedophilia, then the children would not be harmed, and that it brought kindness into the child’s life. (He obviously was blind to the coercion, pain & exploitation that is involved w/ pedophilia). He wrote an article asking for toleration for sexual offenders. I quote James H. Jones’ book “Alfred C. Kinsey” p. 752 which quotes Kinsey writing about pedophilia/incest, “a parent has a property right to children.” (I ask, what about the child’s rights!?!?) Kinsey also used & encouraged lots of predatory sexual abusers for his research. As they sexually abused children, they were to keep track of what happened in detail for him. Many of his reports on the sexual mores of Americans were surveys done in prisons or with sexual offenders, thus giving a skewed view of American sexual values. (If the reader wants to look into this more, there are some youtube videos about Kinsey’s sexual perversions, use of predators for his research, etc.)
The RF funded Kinsey until they got exposed. They had wanted to shun publicity, but two things prevented it from being low key. Kinsey liked to name drop the Rockefeller name as supporting him, & B. Carroll Reece’s Congressional Committee (1954) to expose the un-American activities of the big Foundations came public with the connection between the RF & Kinsey. The RF dropped Kinsey in a heartbeat & switched to Harry Fosdick’s Union Theological Seminary w/ one of their largest grants…$525,000. (By the way, Cox who headed up the orig. 1952 investigation died—murdered?—& Reece & Norman Dodd cont. the House of Rep. investigation in ‘54.) In 1991, I exposed Harry Fosdick & the Union Theological Seminary in my Be Wise As Serpents book… both involved in creating a one world church & globalism for the Illuminati. A One-Wd-Govt. is a stated goal of the RF. One can see why the RF funded the Fabian Socialist London School of Economics.
FOX GUARDS THE CHICKEN HOUSE. In 1911, J.D. Rockefeller, Sr. began giving money (what ended up to be $6million) to the Bureau of Social Hygiene to “scientifically” investigate the white (sexual) slave trade in NY. One result of this project was a Standard Psychological Test created under Robert M. Yerkes.
The RF SUPPORTS EUGENICS, MC, & EBOLA SCARE. The Illuminati put Hitler in power; I knew this from documentation, & later had it directly confirmed to me by their hierarchy. The RF not only funded Amer. eugenic programs, but prior to WW 2 also the Nazi Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (KWIA) and the eugenic program of Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer. Von Verschuer is notable because the Illum. Grand Master Josef Mengele worked for him before going to Auschwitz to conduct his trauma experiments on hapless inmates. At the end of the war, Mengele was smuggled to the Americas, where he was one of the Illuminati’s primary trauma-based mind control programmers here in the U.S. There are survivors of trauma-based m.c. connected to the Rockefeller bloodline. An example of the RF desire for eugenics (renamed population control) is the Pres. of the RF James Knowles’ RF Annual Report, which said their goal was zero population growth.
Now in line with all the population control research that the RF has heavily funded, there is a predictive paper written several years ago by the RF “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development – The Rockefeller Foundation”. It futuristically suggests a new order will be built out of an ebola-like pandemic: “In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza …was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed… infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
“The pandemic blanketed the planet though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”
Did you notice earlier this year how much attention the Bilderbergers were giving to pandemics?? David Rockefeller, although not on the official guest list, attended as he normally does. When the Bilderberg mtg. is held in the U.S., the Rockefeller Illuminati bloodline takes responsibility to set it up, and the RF has paid the bills for these Bilderberg mtgs. (for instance, the ‘91 Woodstock VT Bldbg. Mtg.).
CONTROL OF BOTH EDUCATION & GOVT. The Illuminati delegated to the RF the responsibility to control Amer.’s education & govt. (Of course, there are numerous other control mechanisms working simultaneously.) Norman Dodd discovered in the archives of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (hence in this post referred to as CEIP) the paperwork where the CEIP inform the RF that CEIP will take care of education related to international matters, and that RF has the responsibility to control Amer. education. This is why you see CEIP in 1928 make a $400,000 grant to the Amer. Historical Assoc. & it is why the Carnegie Corp. supports UN programs financially. It explains why the RF and other Rockefeller trusts funded the Univ. of Chicago ($35 million in the first 2 decades). They created the IPR, which got 50% of its funding from the CEIP, RF, & Carnegie Corp. In turn, American schools bought 1 million copies of IPR-prepared textbooks. And the U.S. govt. distributed 750,000 IPR pamphlets to troops in the Pacific in WW 2. To understand how the Illum. got control of education we need to go back to the origins of the RF and John Dewey.
BACK TO THE ORIGINS OF THE RF. John Dewey, a Fabian Socialist, was instrumental in bringing Illum. ideas for education to America. It was John Dewey who trained Illum. mmber Daniel Coit Gilman & 4 of the 5 Rockefeller brothers. First Dewey was at John Hopkins Univ., then the Univ. of Chicago, then to the Teacher’s College at Columbia Univ. He spent his time teaching teachers, so his time was well-leveraged. As a Fabian Socialist, his teachings were based on atheism, socialism, humanism & evolution. He (as well as others) recognized that these teachings could only be inculcated into mainstream Amer. if they destroyed the family & church influence on children. D. Gilman was instrumental in setting up trusts & foundations. As a mmbr. of the Order of Skull & Bones, it was Gilman who incorporated Russell Trust to finance the Skull & Bones. He also was involved in the creation of the Carnegie Inst. & the Russell Sage Foundation. He was the first pres. of the Carnegie Instit.
George Foster Peabody (of the elite Peabody Family & who worked w/ the Rothschilds) set up the Peabody Education Fund after the Civil War w/ money made from slave trading. The pretext purpose was to educate free slaves, but the trust was used to control the new Southern state govt.s & to gain control over southern property. J.P. Morgan was on its Bd. of Dir. for 28 yrs. & never missed a mtg. Peabody & J.D. Rockefeller, Sr. began the General Education Board in 1902. Rockefeller gave it $180 million in funding. His advisor & “Director of Charity” Frederick T. Gates wrote in the GED’s Paper No. 1, “In our dreams…the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our moulding hands. The present educational conventions fade from our minds, and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful…folk.” The Peabody Fund & the General Ed. Bd. were the precursors that the RF was modeled on. So its foundation was built on 2 foundations that manipulated education. The Pratt Illum. family also helped found the RF.
COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS. The RF/Rockefellers built a $500,000 bldg. at 1313 60th St., Chicago for the Council of State Governments. Henry Wolcott Toll, from an elite family, was involved w/ the Council of State Govt.s, he also set up along w/ Robert S. Brookings the Illum.’s Brookings Institute. The Council of State Governments was set up to control state governments. The Toll Fellowship Program, located at Wall St., has a leadership development program for state govt. officials. The RF has been actively involved in controlling U.S. govt. from its beginnings.
RF LEADERSHIP = ILLUM. + ELITES WORKING W/ THEM. If one examines the leadership of the RF you find many Illum. members, many elite bloodlines, and people interlocked with all kinds of Illum. orgs. All the connections & Illum. activities are mind boggling, but why not?…the RF is an Illum. foundation. For the sake of brevity, let’s look at only a few examples.
 JOHN FOSTER DULLES. Dulles was married into the Rockefeller family. He was a chrmn. of the bd for RF. He played such a big role for the elite, it is possible my readers know about him & his brother. 
JOHN JAY MCCLOY: McCloy was a RF trustee (most of the RF trustees like McCloy have been CFR members). Prior to WW 2, McCloy was a lawyer for I.G. Farben (an important Nazi pharma co.). During WW 2, he was the Asst. Secr. Of War. After the war, he was the High Commissioner who ran Occupied Germany, where he ignored large amounts of legal evidence to pardon Illum. mmbr. Alfred Krupp. Oh by the way, McCloy was a mmbr. too…perhaps the ultimate conflict of interest. McCloy was part of a top govt. advisor group called “the Wise Men”. He was personal friends with the Rockefeller family and was assoc. w/ them most of his life. He was active in many Illum. orgs. incl. the Pilgrim Soc., World Bank (pres.), Chase Manhattan (Chrmn.), Ford Found. (Chrmn.) & others. Other World Bank presidents who were RF trustees incl. James Wolfensohn & Geo. D. Woods. The RF, besides influence with education, Illum. policy planning groups like the CFR & Brookings Institute which the RF funds, they also have some influence in the U.S. Supreme Ct. Charles Evans Hughs (Chief Justice, ’30-’41) was a trustee RF, and Sandra Day O’Connor (Supr. Ct. Justice) is a current RF trustee.
 JUDITH RUDIN (current  12th Pres. RF) got her Ph.D. at Columbia Univ. and was a prof. at Yale. Among other things, she is on the Bd. of Dir. of these 2 Illum. enterprises: Citigroup & Blackrock, & Trustee of the Brookings Institute. Forbes labelled her one of the world’s 100 most powerful women.
This has been a condensed look at one of the most powerful Illum. foundations.

Bonhoeffer on Rockefeller and Fosdick

Click for Book Info
Bonhoeffer had no idea what he was walking into at Union, but the bloody battle royale between the liberals and fundamentalists was in full swing in 1930 Union students had a front-row seat. In one corner, weighing in on the side of theological liberalism and occupying the pulpit of Riverside Church—a pebble's toss from Union and built just for him by John D. Rockefeller—was the most famous liberal preacher in America, Harry Emerson Fosdick. In the other corner, weighing in on the side of the historic faith and described as a fundamentalist, stood Dr. Walter Duncan Buchanan, who occupied the pulpit of Broadway Presbyterian Church six blocks south of Union and built with no help from Mr. Rockefeller, thank you.

Fosdick had been the pastor at New York’s First Presbyterian Church when in 1922 he preached an infamous sermon titled "Shall the Fundamentalists Win?" In it he laid out a kind of Apostate's Creed in
which he expressed his serious doubts about most of the historic assertions of the Christian faith, including the Virgin birth, the resurrection, the Divinity of Christ, the atonement, miracles, and the
Bible as the Word of God. This sermon was the opening salvo in a battle that would rage particularly hotly through the 1920s and 1930s. The local presbytery immediately conducted an investigation,
but as a son of the moneyed East Coast WASP establishment, Fosdick had little to fear. His defense was conducted by another establishment scion, John Foster Dulles, who would serve as Eisenhower's secretary of state, and whose father was a well-known liberal Presbyterian minister. Fosdick resigned before they could censure him, and he was

given the pastorate of the fashionably progressive Park Avenue Baptist Church, where John D. Rockefeller was a prominent member, and whose foundation's philanthropic arm was run by Fosdick's own brother.
Seeing an opportunity to knock out fundamentalism in New York, the Rockefeller Foundation promptly funded the construction of a church for Fosdick, one that would serve as a proper platform for his "progressive" modernist views. Bonhoeffer had just begun his studies at Union when it opened—and it opened to such pomp and circumstance that no one could have failed to know about it. It was a major cultural event. But this church was no mere church. It was a spare­ no-expenses cathedral to modernism and progress that had quite literally been modelled on Chartres Cathedral. It had a 392 foot tower and the world's largest carillon, with 72 bells, among them the world's largest. It had a commanding view of the mighty Hudson and was strategically adjacent to Union Theological Seminary, from which Fosdick had graduated and where he would teach courses on homiletics, and where his theology was generally welcomed and disseminated. It was intended to influence the impressionable students of Union, Columbia, and Barnard along its theological lines. It continues to do so eight decades later.
Time magazine, run by another son of the East Coast establishment, Henry Luce, would lead the cheering when Riverside opened that October. It put Fosdick's face on the cover and ran a glowing cover story on him and the church written in the kind of cooing tone
usually reserved for something like a Town and Country feature titled "Myrna Loy at Home":
Dr Fosdick proposes to give this educated community a place of greatest beauty for worship. He also proposes to serve the social needs of the somewhat lonely metropolite. Hence on a vast scale he has built all the accessories of a community church- gymnasium, assembly room for theatricals, dining rooms etc etc. He will have two assistant pastors besides many a staff worker. In ten stories of the 22-story belltower are classrooms for the religious and social training of the young, from nurslings to college scholars. One floor is for the Women’s Society sewing room , anothe for the Women's Bible Class. Dr. Fosdick, study and conference rooms are on the 18th floor, richly decorated. Simple, but more massive in furniture is the floor above where the board of trustees meet ....not all of them rich, not all of them powerful, but all of them sociologically minded.
The flattering portrait painted of Fosdick suggested the son of Galileo and Joan of Arc, and the article managed to take a few potshots at the unwashed fundamentalist hordes whom the ruddy shepherd
boy Fosdick was bravely fighting with his slingshot and Rockefeller's millions.
Bonhoeffer observed that Union was on the side of Fosdick, Rockefeller, and Luce. In an attempt to be more sophisticated than the fundamentalists, whom they hated, they had jettisoned serious scholarship altogether. They seemed to know what the answer was supposed to be and weren't much concerned with how to get there. They knew only that whatever answer the fundamentalists came up with must be wrong. For Bonhoeffer, this was scandalous. He did not agree with Harnack's liberal conclusions, but he appreciated and respected Harnack's respect for the truth and for academic inquiry. At Union he found people who would have agreed with Harnack's liberal conclusions, but who were unworthy to tie the thongs of his sandals. They had no real idea how he came to his conclusions, nor seemed to care.

WIKIPEDIA on the Fosdick Brothers......source
Fosdick was born in Buffalo, New York. He graduated from Colgate University in 1900 and Union Theological Seminary in 1904. While attending Colgate University he joined the Delta Upsilon Fraternity. He was ordained a Baptist minister in 1903 at the Madison Avenue Baptist Church at 31st Street.

While at First Presbyterian Church, on May 21, 1922, he delivered his famous sermon “Shall the Fundamentalists Win?”, in which he defended the modernist position. In that sermon, he presented the Bible as a record of the unfolding of God’s will, not as the literal "Word of God". He saw the history of Christianity as one of development, progress, and gradual change. To the fundamentalists, this was rank apostasy, and the battle lines were drawn.

The national convention of the General Assembly of the old Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. in 1923 charged his local Presbytery in New York to conduct an investigation of his views. A commission began an investigation, as required. His defense was conducted by a lay elder, John Foster Dulles, (1888-1959), (future Secretary of State under President Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1950s), whose father was a well-known liberal Presbyterian seminary professor. Fosdick escaped probable censure at a formal trial by the 1924 General Assembly by resigning from the First Presbyterian Church (historic "Old First") pulpit in 1924. He was immediately hired/"called" as pastor of a new type of Baptist church ministry at Park Avenue Baptist Church whose most famous member was the industrialist/financier/philanthropist John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who then funded the famed ecumenical Riverside Church (later a member of the American Baptist Churches and United Church of Christ denominations) in Manhattan's northwestern Morningside Heights area overlooking the Hudson River and near-by Columbia University, where Fosdick became pastor as soon as the doors opened in October 1930, prompting a Time magazine cover story on October 6, 1930 (pictured). Time said that Fosdick

proposes to give this educated community a place of greatest beauty for worship. He also proposes to serve the social needs of the somewhat lonely metropolite. Hence on a vast scale he has built all the accessories of a community church—gymnasium, assembly room for theatricals, dining rooms, etc. ... In ten stories of the 22-story belltower are classrooms for the religious and social training of the young ..."[7]

Fosdick's brother Raymond ran the Rockefeller Foundation for three decades, beginning in 1921. Rockefeller had funded the nation-wide distribution of "Shall the Fundamentalists Win?", although with a more cautious title, "The New Knowledge and the Christian Faith". This direct-mail project was designed by Ivy Lee, who had worked since 1914 as an independent contractor in public relations for the Rockfellers.

Fosdick was an outspoken opponent of racism and injustice. Alleged victim Ruby Bates credited him with persuading her to testify for the defense in the 1933 retrial of the infamous and racially charged legal case of the Scottsboro Boys in which nine black youths were tried before all white juries for raping white women, Bates and her companion, Victoria Price in Alabama.

Fosdick's sermons won him wide recognition, as did his radio addresses which were nationally broadcast. He authored numerous books, and many of his sermon collections are still in print. He is also the author of the hymn, "God of Grace and God of Glory".

Fosdick's book "A Guide to Understanding the Bible" traces the beliefs of the people who wrote the Bible, from the ancient beliefs of the Hebrews, which he regarded as practically pagan, to the faith and hopes of the New Testament writers.

His brother, Raymond Fosdick, was essentially in charge of philanthropy for John D. Rockefeller, Jr.

Fosdick had a daughter, Dorothy Fosdick, who was foreign policy adviser to Henry M. ("Scoop") Jackson, a United States Senator from Washington state.

He was the nephew of Charles Austin Fosdick, a popular author of adventure books for boys who wrote under the pen name Harry Castlemon.

Fosdick reviewed the first edition of Alcoholics Anonymous in 1939, giving it his approval. AA members continue to point to this review as significant in the development of the AA movement.

Fosdick was an active member of the American Friends of the Middle East,[8] a founder of the Committee for Justice and Peace in the Holy Land, and an active "anti-Zionist."[9]

The False Teachers: Harry Emerson Fosdick
source :  March 26, 2014false teachers
A few weeks ago I set out on a new series of articles through which I am scanning the history of the church—from its earliest days all the way to the present time—to examine some of Christianity’s most notorious false teachers. Along the way we have visited such figures as Arius, Pelagius, Joseph Smith, and Ellen G. White. As we move steadily closer to contemporary times we must pause to take a brief look at the life and ministry of Harry Emerson Fosdick, the foremost proponent and popularizer of theological liberalism.
FosdickHarry Emerson Fosdick was born in Buffalo, New York, on May 24, 1878. As a young boy he claimed to have been born again, but even as a teenager rebelled against the “born again” movement known as fundamentalism. He developed an early interest in theology and chose to pursue ministerial training at Colgate Divinity School where he was influenced by William Newton Clarke, an early advocate of the social gospel. Upon graduating from Colgate he continued to Union Theological Seminary. In 1904 he accepted his first pastorate at First Baptist Church in Montclair, New Jersey, and four years later also accepted a faculty position at Union where he was to teach until 1946. Fosdick quickly proved himself a skilled communicator and compelling speaker and it would not be long before he would be known as America’s foremost minister.
In 1919 Fosdick was asked to become associate pastor at First Presbyterian Church in New York City, though he was allowed to retain his baptistic convictions. He quickly gained a reputation as a leading Christian voice, and hundreds and then thousands descended on First Presbyterian to hear his sermons. It was here, on May 21, 1922, that he preached the sermon that came to define him: “Shall the Fundamentalists Win?” In this sermon he proclaimed that there was a great battle in the church between the fundamentalists and the modernists or liberals, and that he was going to stand firmly on the side of the liberals. Because of his desire to modernize the Christian faith, he soundly rejected belief in a series of traditional Christian doctrines including Christ’s virgin birth, the inerrancy of Scripture, and the literal return of Jesus Christ. He decried the fundamentalists as being intolerant for demanding adherence to doctrines that science, reason, and a modern world could no longer sustain. John D. Rockefeller enjoyed this sermon so much that he had 130,000 copies printed and mailed to every Protestant pastor in the nation.
“Shall the Fundamentalists Win?” set off what would soon be called the Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy. We need to be clear that we cannot import into this battle a twenty-first century understanding of fundamentalism. When Fosdick battled the fundamentalists of his day, he battled nothing less than traditional or conservative Christianity. Fundamentalists were those who insisted upon the key tenets of historic, orthodox Christianity—what they defined as the fundamental doctrines of the faith.
Fosdick was by no means the only liberal theologian of his day, but he was the one to gain the widest acclaim and the broadest platform. While many others were pressing theological liberalism in the seminaries and the halls of academia, Fosdick was on the radio waves and in the bookstores, taking his message to the common people. His voice extended through his radio program, The National Vespers Hour, which was broadcast in the Northern and Eastern United States, and through many bestselling books which eventually sold in the millions. On two separate occasions he was on the cover of TIME magazine.
By the mid 1920’s Fosdick had established himself as the leading voice of twentieth-century liberalism. His stand for liberalism put him at odds with many of the conservative voices in Presbyterianism, and this led him to leave First Presbyterian Church in 1925 and to go instead to Park Avenue Baptist Church.
I am a heretic if conventional orthodoxy is the standard. I should be ashamed to live in this generation and not be a heretic.

In the early 1920’s, J. Gresham Machen emerged as one of the foremost opponents of liberalism. His 1923 book Christianity and Liberalism was a strong, biblical response that drew comparisons between the Bible and liberal theology and showed that the two were in clear opposition. He rightly asked, “The question is not whether Mr. Fosdick is winning men, but whether the thing to which he is winning them is Christianity.” Others joined the battle as well. Fosdick remained firm in the face of such attacks, declaring “They call me a heretic. Well, ‘I am a heretic if conventional orthodoxy is the standard. I should be ashamed to live in this generation and not be a heretic.”
In 1929, Princeton, once a bastion of Reformed thinking and teaching, was reorganized under modernist influences. Almost immediately four Princeton professors who held to the Reformed faith (Robert Dick Wilson, J. Gresham Machen, Oswald T. Allis, and Cornelius Van Til) withdrew from Princeton and established Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia in order to continue upholding the faith Princeton once defended. If the Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy was begun with Fosdick’s sermon in 1922, if was effectively cut off among conservative churches in 1929 with the departure of those professors.
Rockefeller money soon built a grand new building on the Hudson, and in 1930 Fosdick was installed as pastor at Riverside Church. He would pastor this congregation for sixteen years, and, after his retirement, attend it for a further twenty-eight. This church became his laboratory for liberalism and it was here that he practiced his liberal values to the full. (To be fair, and to give credit where credit is due, he was a strong advocate of racial reconciliation and was perhaps the most notable preacher to invite African-American preachers into his pulpit.)
Fosdick died in New York City on October 5, 1969, two weeks after being hospitalized for a heart attack. He was ninety-one years old.
Harry Emerson Fosdick was not an original thinker as much as a popularizer who took the theory of liberalism from the seminaries and brought it to a common level. He wanted to modernize the faith by making it attractive to, and compatible with, modern times and modern sensibilities. At heart, liberalism questioned the nature of the Bible and denied its inerrancy, infallibility, and authority. Liberalism denied that the Bible is the Word of God and insisted instead that it contains the Word of God. Once Scripture’s authority had been denied, a host of doctrines would necessarily fall in its wake.
Fosdick questioned the essential beliefs necessary to be a Christian and began to challenge long-held, orthodox Christian beliefs such as the virgin birth, and the return of Christ Jesus. Robert Moats Miller, one of Fosdick’s biographers, wrote, “Fosdick could not believe that Jesus was virgin born. He did not ridicule those who did, but he was adamant that such belief was not essential to acceptance of Christian faith. … Fosdick doubted whether Jesus ever thought of himself as the Messiah; perhaps he did, but more probably Jesus’ disciples may have read this into his thinking.” He also denied the wrath of God, suggesting that wrath was simply a metaphor for the natural consequences of doing wrong. With wrath removed, it was inevitable that the substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ would also be denied. Before long Fosdick’s Christianity looked nothing like historic Christianity.
In a later sermon, “The Church Must Go Beyond Modernism,” Fosdick spoke of his methodology in modernizing the Christian faith, saying, “We have already largely won the battle we started out to win; we have adjusted the Christian faith to the best intelligence of our day and have won the strongest minds and the best abilities of the churches to our side. Fundamentalism is still with us but mostly in the backwaters. The future of the churches, if we will have it so, is in the hands of modernism.” Of course, he was too optimistic, and too blinded by his own success. Liberalism posed a major challenge to the faith, but like all other challengers, it would rise and then wane.
If Fosdick was the man who popularized and legitimized liberalism, we can rightly say that subsequent liberals, and especially those who operated at the popular level, followed in his footsteps. Men like Norman Vincent Peale, Robert Schuller and John Shelby Spong are among them. Martin Luther King Jr., a theological liberal in his own right, regarded Fosdick as the greatest preacher of the century and in 1958, inscribed a copy of Stride Toward Freedom for Fosdick with these words: “If I were called upon to select the foremost prophets of our generation, I would choose you to head the list.”
But Fosdick’s influence extends farther than that. Though the Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy began within Presbyterianism, it soon spread to other Protestant denominations, eventually leading to today’s division between “mainline” and “evangelical” Protestant churches. About half of today’s mainline Protestants consider themselves liberal, and they, too, whether they know it or not, are influenced by Fosdick.
Fosdick’s teaching was false in many areas, but the heart of it all was his denial of the inerrancy, infallibility and authority of the Bible. He elevated human reason above the plain words of Scripture; he made reason the final arbiter of truth. All the other doctrines he denied depended upon first undermining the Bible. Christians have long insisted, as the fundamentalists did in his day, that God’s Word, not science or human reason, is the measure of true knowledge. Proverbs 3:5-7 says, “Trust in the LORD with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths. Be not wise in your own eyes; fear the LORD, and turn away from evil.” Our understanding of ourselves and the world around us is flawed; we must depend upon God to reveal true knowledge.

If we remove the offense of the gospel, we have removed the power of the gospel.

In his second letter to Timothy, Paul warned, “For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths” (2 Timothy 4:3-4). Fosdick wanted to make the Christian faith soothing to those itching ears and, in so doing, distorted it beyond all recognition. The reality is that the Christian faith is, and always will be, offensive. If we remove the offense of the gospel, we have removed the power of the gospel.
Paul’s words to the Corinthians are perfectly suited to Fosdick and his liberalism:
Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe. For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. (1 Corinthians 1:20-25)

This is a long and, for an unscientific soul like myself, a rather complicated and difficult read. Mathematics and the sciences were my nemesis in school and even now, as I approach my dotage, I can say nothing has changed much in that area. Although this is very technical, I am sure any trained musician will comprehend the scientific aspects with no problem. I admit I come away from it with some confusion regarding the technical aspects, but as for understanding the creation of sheeple, this is a must read.

It also explains why classical music and its various forms have almost disappeared from the consciousness of almost all people today. There is no place according to what you will read, for music that enlightens and expands the spirit of any person, let alone humanity as a whole, according to these elite manipulators of the world.

Additional example of Rockefeller Foundation Manipulating Long Held Traditions : The Fixing of A=440, when it is one of the most disruptive set of frequencies that musicians could ever play at.
This ofcourse is of particular importance to the blog editor Chris Welch who for 33 years has been a professional piano tuner in homes and for prominent musicians such as Andre Previn, Carl Davis, the LSO, Paul Andre Hamelin and many popstars.


By Leonard G. Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH, DNM(hon.)



This article details events in musical history that are central to understanding and treating modern psychopathology, social aggression, political corruption, genetic dysfunction, and cross-cultural degeneration of traditional values risking life on earth. This history concerns A=440Hz “standard tuning,” and the Rockefeller Foundation’s military commercialization of music.

The monopolization of the music industry features this imposed frequency that is “herding” populations into greater aggression, psychosocial agitation, and emotional distress predisposing people to physical illnesses and financial impositions profiting the agents, agencies, and companies engaged in the monopoly.

Alternatively, the most natural, instinctively attractive, A=444Hz (C5=528Hz) frequency that is most vividly displayed botanically has been suppressed. That is, the “good vibrations” that the plant kingdom obviously broadcasts in its greenish-yellow display, remedial to emotional distress, social aggression, and more, has been musically censored.

Thus, a musical revolution is needed to advance world health and peace, and has already begun with musicians retuning their instruments to perform optimally, impact audiences beneficially, and restore integrity to the performing arts and sciences. Music makers are thus urged to communicate and debate these facts, condemn the militarization of music that has been secretly administered, and retune instruments and voices to frequencies most sustaining and healing


Contrary to popular opinion, the most powerful “hard” science influencing society, politics, and economics is behavioral science. This generally neglected fact enables advertising agencies, social engineers, marketing firms, and the persuasive media, to direct people, like cattle, most profitably.

A flock of sheep, for example, according to the Merck Veterinary Manual, responds synchronously to stimuli, such as approaching dogs or humans, due to a special set of nerve cells that fire electrically causing the release of stress hormones associated with the flight response and herd behavior. (1)

Malcolm Gladwell’s, The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, cites social examples of the small levels or percentages of a total population required to act, “at which the momentum for change becomes unstoppable” for the entire social network. (2)

There have been many unexplained “mass hysteria” episodes recorded besides the War of the Worlds fright that was broadcast by CBS Radio and narrated by Orson Welles, on October 30, 1938. (3)

Bartholomew called a related public health crisis, “Occupational Mass Psychogenic Illness” in Transcultural Psychiatry. (4)

Wessely added the warning that this bizarre herd behavior impacting health and well-being reflects poorly on our mass mindset inspired by the terroristic media. He wrote:
“[I]t is easy to lose sight of the dynamic, protean [varied] nature of mass sociogenic illness and its historical and transcultural manifestations, which mirror popular social and cultural preoccupations that define each era and reflect unique social beliefs about the nature of the world.” (5)


Assuming the field of physics, including biophysics, is valid, and the universe, including life, is primordially constructed energetically ~ mathematically/harmonically/musically ~ energy (including bioenergy or spirituality as a medium of consciousness) impacts us physically very powerfully, and is mediated vibrationally, really hydrosonically, through sounds’ effects on water. (6)
Water, nearly eighty percent of human body weight, is a liquid crystal superconductor.
“Structured water” science, (7) as well as the field of electro-genetics, (6) proves this thesis adequately, given light (photons) and sound (phonons) have been shown to signal communications within and between cells , via a liquid crystal proteo-glycan matrix in cells and tissues. (6)

This strongly evidences the theory of hydrosonic creationism involving DNA and structured water. (7)

Thus, bio-creation and health restoration may have more to do with frequencies of sound energy, or music, than has been thought.

There are a lot of people who consider modern music annoying. Many become emotionally disturbed listening to certain types of music. What few people realize, regardless of the type of music played in the Western World, the standard Anglo-American tuning for instruments and voices was instituted at the same time, by the same agents and agencies, advancing acoustic war studies for inducing “mass hysteria.” (8)

Analyzing the antecedents of current geopolitics and economics, this dirty fact of musical history may be foundational to the status-quo, and instrumental to contemporary sociocultural crises, including modern pandemic psychopathology.

Throughout history there have been persons of wealth and power engaged in war-making, profiteering, and various methods of population control. In 1770, for instance, Mayer Amschel Bauer (a.k.a., Rothschild) developed plans for the creation of the Illuminati, advancing the mission of global domination through a network of central banks that his family and their silent partners controlled. (9, 10)

Many reputable authors track today’s degenerative socioeconomic trends, and aboriginal genocides, to the Illuminati’s powerful influence administered through private organizations controlling multi-national corporations and governments (i.e., secret societies and governing councils, such as the Council on Foreign Relations). (6-15)
“As a result of this influence,” wrote Thomas D. Schauf in a controversial review article and commentary urging the termination of the un-American Federal Reserve Bank, and the offshore bankers’ control over the U.S. Treasury, “the arc of Western Civilization has gone from ‘ascent’ ~ belief in God ~ focused on the higher centers of love, joy, purity and selflessness, to descent . . . focused on the lower centers of consciousness like those of power, wealth and physical gratification.
The apex was called the ‘Enlightenment,’ when the ‘Illuminated ones’ ~ a Luciferian term meaning ‘keepers of the light’ ~ took over for God. Typical of Satan, decline into moral darkness is represented as light.” (11)
Light and sound is generated and measured mathematically, according to frequencies. It stands to reason then, following Schauf’s empirically evidenced thesis, we are engaged in a “conspiracy reality” in which ultimate power and control is waged bioenergetically (i.e., biospiritually), through frequency modulations or electromagnetic manipulations affecting “consciousness” and impacting biology, physiology, and human behavior.

In 1913, the Rothschilds set up their third and current central bank in America, the Federal Reserve Bank, with the help of their agents JP Morgan and JD Rockefeller, whose investments in American industry had been Rothschild-financed since 1865. (9, 11)
World Wars I and II evidence the banking cartel’s profitable depopulation politics and policies. For instance, in 1914, at the beginning of World War I, the German Rothschild bank loaned money to the German government, the British Rothschild bank loaned money to Britain, and the French Rothschild bank loaned money to the French government.
War propaganda served the Rothschild’s geopolitical and financial agendas, and was provided by the three main European news agencies, Wolff in Germany, Reuters in England, and Havas in France, each financed by Rothschild banks. (9, 11)

Between World Wars I and II, accelerating during the 1930s, scientific studies in musical frequencies best suited for war-making were funded by the Rothschild-Rockefeller alliance, represented by the Rockefeller Foundation and U.S. Navy. (8-10)
A major objective of this war, and profitable population control, research was to determine the musical factors capable of producing psychopathology, emotional distress, and “mass hysteria.” (8)
Academically directed by grants provided by the Rockefeller Foundation, in concert with the US Navy and National Defense Research Council according to the foundation’s archives, acoustic energy researchers, including Harold Burris-Meyer, an audio engineer and drama instructor at New Jersey’s Stevens Institute of Technology, were commissioned. (8)

Burris-Meyer is best known for providing consulting services to the Muzak Corporation, “which used his expertise to optimize sound installations in factories so that emotional motivation of workers achieved through music would not be adversely effected by factory noise . . ,” wrote James Tobias, a Professor of English at the Univ. of Calif. (8)

Tobias reviewed Rockefeller Foundation (RF) archives, and documented investigations leading to psychological warfare applications of acoustic vibrations, ultimately advanced militarily and commercially. (8)

Burris-Meyer, according to Tobias, contributed to the Department of Defense during World War II, “including building speaker arrays deployed on warplanes such that enemy combatants could be addressed from the air” to produce psycho-emotional affects leading to “mass hysteria.” (8)

Additionally, the Princeton Radio Project played a role in this research. This occurred precisely at the time the atomic bomb Manhattan Project was beginning at Princeton involving Albert Einstein at the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS). (12)


Linking this “conspiracy reality” to the development of music for “mass hysteria,” and aversive public health impacts, the IAS “think tank” was formed from the “vision of founding Director Abraham Flexner,” according to the IAS website. (13)

The infamous Abraham Flexner, educated in Germany and America, on staff at the Carnegie Foundation, and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, sourced the American medical reformation following US Congressional acceptance of his “Flexner Report.” (14)
This infamous treatise exclusively benefited the Anglo-American IG Farben-Rockefeller petrochemical-pharmaceutical alliance that vilified every form of natural healing to monopolize healthcare. Based on Flexner’s report, advancing the Rockefeller’s agenda, the US Government exclusively imposed medicine’s reliance on deadly, not curative, drugs as is ongoing today.
The Rockefeller Foundation’s Assistant Director for the Humanities at the time Flexner compiled his report was John Marshall, who along with the authors of Composing for the Films(Oxford University Press, 1947) Hanns Eisler and Theodor Adorno, were featured performers in the musical projects serving military and commercial interests, juxtaposed with artistic and philanthropic objectives. (8)

As this research and development of the broadcasting industry advanced to impact “herd behavior” and public health, it is clear that any malady generated musically/vibrationally (i.e., bioenergetically), would increase investors’ profitability.

Although Eisler or Adorno appear to be innocent of wrongdoing, according to Tobias, both were unfavorably treated by project officials. Eisler opposed the militarization of music used for cultural manipulation, and was eventually deported following years of harassment by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This publicity generated embarrassment for the Rockefeller Foundation. (8)

According to Tobias, Burris-Meyer became convinced that “audio control of human emotions was possible for a large enough portion of an audience to provide effective crowd control ~ a line of research,” that John Marshall, “ultimately found irrelevant for understanding the artistic or cultural values of music. . . . ” but obviously fulfilled a military objective. (8)

This best explains why this activity is linked in time, subject matter, Foundation funding, and the Rothschild-Rockefeller increasing war investments in Germany, Great Britain, and the US, to establishing the Western World’s standard musical tuning of A=440Hz frequency.

The fact that A=440Hz standard tuning is relatively distressing, as adequately evidenced below and elsewhere, (7, 20-22) implicates these parties and their research into aversive musical frequencies for military and commercial uses.


Raising more suspicion, when I personally contacted Professor Tobias to request his consent to link his online paper to this article, to pull quotes of up to 600 words from it, or receive a submission from him for publication in Medical Veritas journal, he declined saying he did not wish to jeopardize future publication of his work. However, a simple Internet search located his manuscript already published by the Rockefeller Archive Center with the following ethically repugnant notice:
“This research report is presented here with the author’s permission but should not be cited or quoted without the author’s consent. . . .

“Rockefeller Archive Center Research Reports Online is a periodic publication of the Rockefeller Archive Center. . . . intended to foster the network of scholarship in the history of philanthropy and to highlight the diverse range of materials and subjects covered in the collections at the Rockefeller Archive Center. The reports are drawn from essays submitted by researchers who have visited the Archive Center, many of whom have received grants from the Archive Center to support their research. The ideas and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and are not intended to represent the Rockefeller Archive Center.” (8)
Frankly, under “fair use” copyright laws, Dr. Tobias, and the Rockefeller Archive Center, has zero right to prohibit his Internet published work, currently available for review here, (8) to be withheld from public scrutiny and scholarly commentary, particularly as it involves matters of widespread psychosocial pathology, public health, and national security, not simply “the history of philanthropy.”

For the record, Dr. Tobias neglected to reply to my invitation to prepare a Medical Veritas submission, or consent to be interviewed by me on this topic.


Tobias’s manuscript makes it clear that he was alarmed at his discovery that bioenergetic research in acoustic science focused on producing the social impacts of emotional arousal and even “mass hysteria.” This research included “investigations in ‘physical analysis’ of sound effects, . . . an established technique which others may use in practice dependably . . ,” the determination of measures by which audience reactions could be accessed, “’even without any technical capacity for psychological measurement of audience response,’” and the use of sound effects that “produced what was really mass hysteria.” (8)

Tobias noted the Foundation-funded investigations extended to “‘average tolerance of sound effects of different intensities and of different frequencies,’ or . . . the effectiveness of sound in relation to different noise levels . . . (Page 66).
“The clear interest here seems to be in the ‘dramatic’ use emphasized in . . . bringing audiences, with the use of the ‘sensory appeal’ of sound effects, to states of ‘mass hysteria.’” (8)
These revelations best account for the “mass hysteria” demonstrated by audiences responding to “Rock-n-Rollers,” initially Elvis Presley, followed by the “British Invaders.” It was recently revealed that The Beatles were barred from performing in Israel following an investigation that prompted the education ministry to conclude the Beatles’ performances caused:
"Hysteria and mass disorder. . . There is no musical or artistic experience here, but a sensual display that arouses feelings of aggression replete with sexual stimuli." (26)
At that time, the Israeli Mossad was effectively tracking Her Majesty’s Secret Service (MI6) and CIA’s military interests, as it had been since WWII. (6,10,14)

In 1938 the British-American radio and television cartel was funded and administered by the Rockefeller Foundation, also funding Jewish hate and administering Nazi eugenics. (29)

This Anglo-American media connection was evidenced by Michele Hilmes. (15)
On August 31, 1957, hysterical crowds trampled people, including Canadian reporter, John Kirkwood, who wrote: “It was like watching a demented army swarm down the hillside to do battle in the plain when those frenzied teenagers stormed the field. Elvis and his music played a small part in the dizzy circus. The big show was provided by Vancouver teenagers, transformed into writhing, frenzied idiots of delight by the savage jungle beat music. A hard, bitter core of teenage troublemakers turned Elvis Presley’s one-night stand at the Empire Stadium into the most disgusting exhibition of mass hysteria and lunacy this city has ever witnessed. . . . Colonel Parker also enjoyed reading the accounts of the riot the next day.” (16)
It turns out that Colonel Tom Parker, Elvis’s manager, was suspect for illegally joining the U.S. Army as a European immigrant. He broke his co-management contract with Hank Snow for exclusive control over Elvis’s career, developed Presley’s contact with RCA (discussed below), and worked under the alias of “Col. Tom Parker,” a name that he secretly stole from his Army base commander, Captain Tom Parker. His real name was Andreas Cornelis ("Andries") van Kuijk. (17)
Thus, the Empire Stadium riot pleasing to “Parker” was most likely a successful US military-RCA experiment to induce “mass hysteria,” especially since RCA, according to Tobias, was a major participant in the Rockefeller Foundation-funded research to musically produce this precise audience impact. (8)

During WWI, US Navy suppressed patents owned by the major companies involved with radio manufacture in the US facilitated the Brit’s war effort. All production of radio equipment at that time was allocated for the Army and Navy. The Navy sought to maintain a Rockefeller-administered military-government monopoly over the radio industry featuring advances in wireless radio.

This wartime command over radio never ended, as some believe, due to the specious congressional indecision the Rockefeller leadership forced regarding the maintenance of the supposed governmental control over radio in 1918.

The questionable (mis)direction of the corporatist-government monopoly did not prevent the Navy from creating a national radio system. On April 8, 1919, US Navy officials met with General Electric Company (GE) executives to develop an American owned radio company, so that the Navy could continue operating as a “front,” exercising its control over the commercial radio monopoly. The resulting purchase of American Marconi by GE satisfied this command and birthed the Radio Corporation of America (RCA).
The incestuous commercial-military cartel that formed included RCA, General Electric, United Fruit, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and AT&T. This alliance laid the groundwork for fascist control over the energy industries, including human energy (bioenergy) and spirituality that overlaps electro-genetics, and the eugenics and psychiatric genetics movements advanced at that time by the same players. (18)
The resulting developments included the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), and a government created monopoly in radio and television, with AT&T controlling telephone communications. (6, 7, 18)

Hilmes’s review of Rockefeller Foundation archives proves that a major objective of the cartel was to coordinate British and American corporate and military interests in radio research and television broadcasting, initially featuring the BBC and RCA. Tobias’s review showed their research focused on psychotronic warfare, physiological stress induction, negative affective (emotional) arousal, mass persuasion, herd behavior, and population control. This “black op” is evidenced in many ways aside from the communications reviewed by Tobias and Hilmes. (8, 15)

October 6, 1938, for example, the year before A=440Hz standard tuning was adopted, researcher David Stevens wrote to Frank Jewett, vice-president of ATT, regarding studies to “control the emotional response of audiences by mechanical means.” Jewett’s response letter of October 11, 1938, noted Bell Labs officials expressed “embarrassment” for the company’s involvements in this nefarious project, despite its profitable applications and military merits. (8)

“Thus,” Tobias wrote, “this project was a typical Rockefeller Foundation project, in that the goals were partially speculative, but grounded, always, in establishing institutional networks that might ultimately grow into much larger, actually feasible mass media development projects serving commercial interests but having ‘educational’ or ‘dramatic’ uses.” Military, or “non-commercial, ‘social research,’ was an important way in building not-yet commercial mass media systems and applications . . .” (8)

This research was eventually applied in the development of modern methods of public persuasion, and cultural indoctrination, by television and radio networks currently considered “the mainstream media.”

It must be emphasized that by 1961, according to a series of Rockefeller Brothers Fund reports concerned with their search for America’s “National Purpose,” that:
We The People would be governed by the assertion that a “prudent corporate and military leadership of the National Security State could link guns, butter, and the new technology of missile and nuclear weapons production to the cause of Freedom and the Free World.” (7; p. 204)

According to the Rockefeller Foundation’s archives, the Rockefellers financed and helped organize the military media monopoly over broadcasting, and through various forms of “education,” the programmable public’s mindset.

Tobias, neglecting the foundation’s cartel arrangements, noted that television competition between NBC and CBS was “secretive and fierce as production went into experimental phases. . . .” (8)

Evidencing the intended illusion of competition, Congress, in 1974, investigated the Rockefeller-directed Chase Manhattan Bank's stakes in CBS and NBC that rose to 14.1 and 4.5 percent, respectively through NBC’s parent, RCA. The Congress recorded that the Chase Manhattan Bank held stock in 28 broadcasting firms, including start-ups based on musical intelligence. After this report, the Chase Manhattan Bank obtained 6.7% of ABC. The bank only required five percent ownership to significantly influence “programming” ~ a “psyops” term meaning educational indoctrination, otherwise called propaganda ~ for sociocultural engineering. (11)

Tobias continued, “Burris-Meyer wanted to measure audience response to the sound effects, and considered wiring audience members with a ‘psycho-galvanometer.’” (8)

According to televangelist, turned enemy of the pagan corporatist state, Pat Robertson, the CHASE bank is a wealthy shareholder in the FED. “It is believed other FED owners have similar holdings in the media,” Robertson cautioned in his book, The New World Order. “To control the media, FED bankers call in their loans if the media disagrees with them.” On page 131, he recommended abolishing the FED. (12)

John Marshall wrote that for responses to sound to be effective, “emotion involvement is required. If the psycho-galvanometer gives even a rough measure of emotional involvement, perhaps that is sufficient for Burris-Meyer’s purposes.” Marshall then “urged Burris-Meyer to seek consultation from psychologists who had consulted on the Princeton Radio Project. Thereafter, Burris-Meyer worked through the American Film Center to experiment with the recording of sound effects on film.” (8)

Tobias noted that RF offered network broadcasting and industrial connections to their grant awardees that assured success in the industry and dispersion of research developments with commercial value. “Rockefeller support,” he wrote, “particularly through Marshall’s insights and wide ranging personal network, typically and vastly expanded the human and institutional resources of any project grantee, in addition to monetary support. . . .” (8)

”[M]usicality enabled a ‘technicolor’ proof of affective public address,” Tobias added, “raising the possibility of greater audience involvement and the spectre of greater audience manipulation; the clear educational and commercial application for musicality as ‘control’ stressed in Burris-Meyer’s ‘sound show’ . . . in works like Disney’s Fantasia, were as much justifications for, as much as demonstrations of, the use of [these] advanced [acoustic warfare] technologies . . .” (8)


The introduction of electronic sound for stage, screen, and television did not proceed fluidly.

In 1910, motivated by a grant provided by the Rockefeller Foundation for the American Federation of Musicians, the initial effort to institute A=440Hz standard tuning had limited success in America. In Europe, the initial effort had near zero impact. Additional promotions were needed to secure the music world’s acceptance of A=440Hz that was perceived as less pleasant, or dull when compared with other frequencies described below.

Ironically, and most revealing about the Anglo-American cartel arrangement, to persuade European musicians to accept this tuning, and the British Standards Institute (BSI) adoption of it in 1939, Rockefeller-Rothschild “black-op” officials employed Nazi party propagandist, Joseph Goebbels. At that time, Goebbels was advancing to become England’s greatest media nemesis.

Lynn Cavanagh reviewed the history of standard musical tuning and determined that contrary to propaganda, and current consensus, it was 1939, not 1938, as the true year the British Standards Institute (BSI) adopted the A=440Hz standard promoted by the Rockefeller-Nazi consortium. (16)

At the time, England was about to declare war with Germany, so surely MI6 would have known of Rockefeller’s alliance with IG Farben, the Standard Oil Company’s fueling of Hitler’s military build-up against Poland, and the funding of Hitler by the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Warburg family bankers backing IG Farben and the Nazi’s as partners in their emerging genocide.

In other words, the A=440Hz frequency was instituted at the precise time WWII preparations were being finalized by the petrochemical-pharmaceutical war financiers.

Hitler’s Germany invaded Poland officially starting WWII on Sept 1, 1939. Only three months earlier, following widespread rejection of the A=440Hz frequency vibration by musicians worldwide, Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels argued on behalf of this, apparently very important, intrusion into musical artistry, effectively persuading Hitler’s supposed enemies in Britain to adopt this allegedly superior standard tuning for the “Master Race.”

After the war, the Rockefeller Standard Oil Company was indicted by a US Federal Court, as an “enemy national,” that is, an American traitor. (16)


Research and developments in musical weaponry, tuning with dissonant frequencies, yielding the latest and greatest war making technology for broadcasting “mass hysteria,” was finally instituted in 1939 ~ speciously adopted, thusly, according to Cavanagh:
Success was achieved at a 1939 international conference held in London. Presumably as a compromise between current tendencies and earlier pitch standards, it was agreed that the international standard for concert pitch would thenceforth be based upon A=440 Hz ~ very close to the Royal Philharmonic’s A=439 Hz of dubious derivation. The B.B.C. began to broadcast the A=440 Hz tuning note, which, for the sake of accuracy was produced electronically. (16)
To help reconcile what was made irreconcilable by covert operators and censorship, Cavanagh referenced Llewelyn S. Lloyd, and a representative of the BSI knowledgeable about Lloyd’s publication in the Journal of the Royal Society of Arts (16 Dec., 1949; 80-81.) entitled “International Standard Musical Pitch.”

Without acknowledging the creative artistry and spirituality of music-making, here is how propagandists at the B.B.C., effectively controlled by Rothschild-Rockefeller banking families, electrically generated the 440Hz frequency pure tone for media broadcasting:
The B.B.C. tuning-note is derived from an oscillator controlled by a piezo-electric crystal that vibrates with a frequency of one million Hz. This is reduced to a frequency of 1,000 Hz by electronic dividers; it is then multiplied eleven times and divided by twenty-five, so producing the required frequency of 440 Hz. As 439 Hz is a prime number a frequency of 439 Hz could not be broadcast by such means as this. (16)
Although the above detailed technical description for 440Hz pure tone generation using electronic generators that were militarily designed and custom built for the networks may be valid, these historic facts have serious criminal implications.
According to preliminary research, analysis, and professional discussions by Walton, Koehler, Reid, et al., on the web, (23) A=440Hz frequency music conflicts with human energy centers (i.e., chakras) from the heart to the base of the spine. Alternatively, chakras above the heart are stimulated. Theoretically, the vibration stimulates ego and left-brain function, suppressing the “heart-mind,” intuition and creative inspiration.
Not coincidently metaphysically, the interval between A=440Hz (equivalent to F#=741Hz in the ancient original Solfeggio scale) and A=444Hz (C(5)=528Hz in the ancient original Solfeggio scale) is classically known as the Devil’s Interval in musicology, due to its highly aversive disharmonious sound made when these two notes are played simultaneously. (36)

More harmonious alternatives have been obviously suppressed. For instance, during the past decade, A=444Hz (C(5)=528Hz) analysis found this frequency more compatible with nature. (22)

If humanity were to be optimally suppressed spiritually, the musical tuning of A=444Hz would be neglected religiously, as it has been. Religious leaders suppressed the original Solfeggio musical scale in which A=444Hz, virtually equivalent to (C(5)=528Hz, is the “MI” tone or “MIracle” note played by the Pythagoreans referenced by Tobias as subscribing to the bioenergetic epistemologies described by Helmholtz. (8)

Much of this recovered knowledge was suppressed over the millennia. But enough of the amazing details about 528Hz frequency (A=444Hz) are provided in Hydrosonics journal, LOVE528.com, and LOVE The Real da Vinci CODE, to prompt international outrage concerning the A=440Hz imposition, and a musical revolution. (22)

This knowledge best explains why so many musicians intuitively feel better tuning up, or down, a bit sharp or flat, from A=440Hz “standard tuning.” More natural alternatives, especially A=444Hz (C=528Hz) and A=432Hz, and have been growing in popularity. (21, 22)

Recording artists seek the ultimate musical expression reflected in Divine-human communion. Musicians who are spiritually-sensitive to pitch are compelled instinctively to reject intrusions to pure creativity in harmony with the flow of sacred cosmic energy.

Lloyd, for example, an expert and leading critic of A=440Hz tuning, described his innate drive to “tune-up” to a “brighter,” more soothing and inspiring frequency. He described this as “an indelible calling for a higher pitch.” The British author and composer expressed his preference for precisely A=444Hz tuning. He wrote that this 4Hz higher pitch is more pleasing generally for musicians worldwide. (16)

Here are his words:
My own experience in tuning an electronic organ to be used as a continuos instrument with orchestra, in the late 1940s and early ’50s, showed me that New York orchestra musicians could with difficulty be induced to tune their instruments to a'=440 Hz, but that if the organ were tuned to that pitch it would in the course of performance be flat as compared with the other instruments. If, on the other hand, I tuned the organ to a'=444 Hz, this difficulty disappeared, and I take it that this latter pitch is approximately that at which New York orchestra musicians habitually play, and to which they involuntarily tend to return even if they have started out by tuning their instruments to a'=440 Hz. (16)
Similarly, recent research by veteran piano tuner and custom piano builder, Daniel Koehler, demonstrated the beneficial acoustic and spiritual impact of prototype pianos that include granite bridges to best accommodate the higher tension of strings tuned to A=444Hz (C=528Hz). Koehler reported most enthusiastically (23) that the 528Hz frequency resonates most powerfully and enduringly. Measuring volume and duration of string resonance, Koehler wrote:

"We took an introductory level small grand at 5 feet 1 inch long, and surpassed every 9 foot grand in the world on most of the piano concerning sustain with lack of fall-off. This is, with no boasting intended, actual fact on which I would stake my 35-year professional reputation." (24)


A lot has been written on the A=432Hz tuning preference that is mathematically consistent with the Fibonacci series of numbers, and, therefore, universal design. Among the advocates of A=432Hz standard tuning is musician and researcher, Brian T. Collins, who launched a website dedicated to posting articles supportive to this growing musical-metaphysical movement for recovering optimal spirituality through music “therapy.” (21)

Collins wrote,
“The current tuning of music based on A=440 Hz does not harmonize on any level that corresponds to cosmic movement, rhythm, or natural vibration. Mozart and Verdi both based their music on natural vibration, and A=432 was nicknamed the ‘Verdi tuning.’ Most western music, including popular New Age music is still tuned at unnatural A=440Hz. The difference between A=440 Hz and A=432 Hz is only 8 vibrations per second, but it is a perceptible difference in the human consciousness experience.” (21)
An expanded review of A=432Hz tuning finds it throughout the religious world according to many researchers. “One of the oldest uses of sound is for ceremonial and religious purposes. Whether the chanting of a Hindu mantra, the recitation of the Jewish cantor, a Christian hymn, or the call of a Moslem muezzin, sacred sound makes its way into all of the various world's religions. According to Robert Lewis, a student of the Rosicrucian Fellowship: ‘The purpose of music in religious service is to raise the vibratory rate of a congregation upward through a series of overtones to a spiritual level.’" (21)
“Archaic Egyptian instruments that have been unearthed, so far, are largely tuned to A=432Hz. In ancient Greece (the school book original place for music) their instruments were predominantly tuned to 432Hz. Within the archaic Greek Eleusenian Mysteries, Orpheus is the god of music, death and rebirth, and was the keeper of the Ambrosia and the music of transformation (his instruments were tuned at 432Hz). (25)
“. . . [O]ne can make audible harmonics, such as 72Hz (9 x 8 Hz), 144Hz (18 x 8 Hz) and 432Hz; and then further synchronize the music in binaural 8Hz, to reawaken us to the orchestra of our thoughts, in the cathedrals of our minds. Such musical harmonics may also resonate and upload one into a geometrical progression and harmonic to time, which is generally accepted to be the congruence of the amino acid/codon metabolism within the DNA double helix. (25)

A=444 (C(5)=528HZ) VERSUS A=432

It is readily apparent from a simple mathematical analysis that A=444Hz and A=432 Hz are harmonically related and both, reportedly, therapeutic. Prove the harmony yourself by simply subtracting 432 from 444. It yields 12; where 1+2=3 in Pythagorean math. Now take 528 and subtract 444 and you also get 12, or 3. Next, take 528 and subtract 432 to get 96; where 9+6=15; and 1+5=6. This result is identical to 5+2+8=15 or 6.

Notice this set of numbers ~ 3s, 6s, 9s and 8s ~ are always exclusively represented by these special natural pure tones, their scales, and their harmonics. This is precisely what Leonardo da Vinci’s mentors emphasized about cosmic scales and mathematics. (21, 22)

Nikola Tesla, too, taught his students about this unique set of numbers, and always applied this math in his research and inventions, including free energy machines, also suppressed by the same petrochemical-pharmaceutical corporatists that advanced A=440Hz standard tuning and nuclear energy. (26)

Tobias (page 91-92) also wrote of these esoteric “epistemologies” in the context of reviewing Rockefeller Foundation and US Navy funding for militarizing music. He wrote,

“In the course of this large-scale historical transition in which bioinformatic epistemologies drew from and displaced bioenergetic [i.e., biospiritual] ones, . . . [h]istorically, “visual music” theorists have attributed such attempts at writing sound in magnetic, electrical, electronic, or digital media as indebted to a larger history of “color organs,” alchemy, or Pythagorean or neo-Pythagorean epistemologies. Here, though, we see the tensions in clear detail: at stake is a historical transition between essentially bioenergetic epistemologies after Helmholtz and bioinformatic epistemologies emerging with Turing, Wiener, or Shannon.” (8)

In the grand tradition of “bioenergetic epistemologies,” this author advanced “The Perfect Circle of Sound” ~ a decryption of “The Real da Vinci Code,” featured in the esoteric artist’s most famous drawing, The Vitruvian ‘Wo/Man,’ that includes the original Solfeggio scale. (27)

Here, the 3s, 6s, and 9s, are exclusively represented by the set of natural harmonics mathematically linked to ancient Pi, Phi, the Fibonacci series, and the construction of the physical universe from sound vibrations acting on water. (36) (See mathematical proofs in Victor Showell’s monographs in the journal HYDROSONICS, and also at LOVE528.com.)

Alternatively, Tobias concluded, “the Rockefeller Foundation’s careful project management and coordination,” contributed to the materialistic versus metaphysical industrialization of music in the media. (8)


Besides the U.S. Navy’s administrative control over the National Public Health Service in America, this branch of the military has always been at the forefront of war research, including biological weaponry, virology, genetics. electro-genetics, DNA recombinomics, technical developments in electronics, communications, and signaling, and military intelligence bearing on the subject of frequencies required for producing “mass hysteria.”

Rather than researching electromagnetic and bio-acoustic methods of promoting peaceful co-existence, the Navy has invested in space-based weaponry, including satellite communications useful in advancing psychotronic warfare for population control. (10, 29)
In short, US Naval Intelligence oversees or administers the most advanced science in the fields of energy, bioenergy, and communications on behalf of global industrialists. Nuclear, radiological, biological, chemical, and musical weapons for controlling humanity most profitably and effectively fall within the Navy’s jurisdiction. (10)
Given this history, it is not surprising US Navy celebrity, John Calhoun Deagan, is credited for having allegedly persuaded the American Federation of Musicians in 1910, at its annual convention, to adopt A=440 standard tuning for orchestras and bands . . .” (30)

Also, around this time, the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations began providing grants to support the pseudoscience called “eugenics,” or “racial hygiene.” (21)

The Rockefeller Foundation has been a prime sponsor of the United Nations' depopulation program. Terminating six billion people on earth is their current objective. (31, 32)
Although most people find this hard to believe, thanks to media propaganda, massive depopulation is being advanced by the world’s wealthiest industrialists, among them Bill Gates who promotes poisonous vaccinations he lectures will reduce nearly 900,000,000 people in the coming years, as shown in the documentary film, PHARMAWHORES: The SHOWTIME Sting of Penn & Teller.

Historic accounts document the Rockefeller Foundation and its corporate, medical, political and financial associates organized and administered eugenics ~ the “science of genetic differences between the races” ~ a mass murder program invented by the Anglo-American cartel and adopted by the Nazis. (10, 28)

A=440Hz tuning, along with Psychiatric Genetics, was instituted at this precise time with more Foundation money. For this new field of “science,” the Foundation reorganized medical education in Germany, creating and henceforth directing the ``Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry,'' and the ``Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity.''(14)

The Rockefellers' chief executive of these institutions was the infamous fascist war criminal, Swiss psychiatrist Ernst Rudin, assisted by his protégés Otmar Verschuer and Franz J. Kallmann. (14)

In 1932, the British-led ``Eugenics'' movement designated the Rockefellers' appointee Rudin as the president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation. The movement called for the killing or sterilizing of people whose heredity made them a perceived burden. (14)

The Rockefeller Foundation’s German grantees drew upon existing American (i.e., Virginia’s) “racial hygiene” statutes. Verschuer and his assistant Josef Mengele collaborated on reports for special courts which enforced Rudin's racial purity law against cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans. (14)


According to Tobias, the wartime economy provided greater funding for musical research and development for opportunists with conflicting military and “non-profit” interests. As military funding increased, in September, 1941, Burris-Meyer was encouraged by the Navy Sub-committee on Sound Sources of the National Defense Research Council to receive $50,000 for another one year contract to deliver what was called his “command performance.” (8)

In January 1942, in a letter to John Marshall, Burris-Meyer stated his belief that military applications of his acoustic research would be used in the entertainment industry following the war. Soon thereafter, a California defense contractor planned to develop “wired music” installations to deliver Muzak-style ambient sound in movie theaters. (8)

Tobias detailed, “[t]he power of sound control to create musical, corporeal synchronization.”
That is, people’s bodies would bioenergetically entrain to the musical frequencies and electronically-engineered sound effects that would be most emotionally charged causing people to act in certain programmable ways.
This would occur “across a variety of environments,” and “across the war-time economy . . .” Tobias noted that Burris-Meyer had, in service to this risky vision, been “requisitioned by the Navy,” and with R.L. Cardinell, co-wrote, a “Guide to Industrial Sound,” published by the War Production Board (73 200R, RG 1.1, Series 200, Box 282, Folder 3353). (8)

“Sound control,” according to Tobias, “worked for the Rockefeller Foundation, as a general signifier of cultural, factory, and military industries,”

Tobias’s legendary characters considered the long-term implications of militarizing music “in terms of both conflicts between “trade” and “research,” as well as . . . the Foundation’s goal of developing non-profit, educational, industrial, and military institutional networks . . .” (8)

This, Tobias wrote, “is, in fact, the crux . . . in the overall commoditization of listening across educational, artistic, working, consuming, and military environments. [T]he ‘culture industries’ were the commercial arm legitimating a broader control of consciousness.” (8)
As in the 1500s, wherein Shakespearian plays were promotionally pivotal in advancing English as the New World language, the twentieth century’s mass mediated musical manipulation of culture and consciousness is hereby exposed as the modus operandi of the Illuminati.
On May 16, 1949, Rockefeller Foundation’s Charles B. Fahs ran into Burris-Meyer on the train platform at Penn Station in Newark, and rode with him to Philadelphia. Burris-Meyer was in uniform as a naval officer, heading to Washington for further military research work . . . on “the problem of the control of human emotion as a determinant of action.” (8)

“B-M points out . . . the realization that we were moving into an era when such control of human emotion would be technically possible which led to the development of Nazism in Germany. It is clearly indicated in Mein Kampf and in the work of Goebbels.

According to B-M, his wartime work demonstrated that means to control emotion with sufficient precision to determine the action of from two to eight percent of a given population . . . While this percentage of a population is small, it is perhaps quite adequate to be decisive.

There is no use ignoring the possibility of such techniques and hoping that the disturbing visions of what the effects in politics might be will go away. The question is rather, as in the case of the atom bomb, whether the techniques will be mastered and utilized for democratic purposes before they are exploited for totalitarian purposes. This is the background of B-M’s conviction that this work is important and urgent in the United States.” (8)

Following Hanns Eisler’s deportation from the United States to Germany where he joined the East German intellectual establishment, a 1958 interview he published is noteworthy. Defending the East German youth under attack in West Germany “for indulging in what he agreed was the false ecstasy of ‘boogie-woogie’ and the ‘stupid’ fashion of American-style jeans,” Eisler commented in reference to politics, youth, and urgent insurmountable social challenges, “[T]he American culture industries have a monumental influence over the entire world.” (8, 33)


The science of coercion, cultural indoctrination, and behavior modification has a lot to do with the world’s current crises, history of musical instrument tuning, and the media.

This review of Rockefeller Foundation literature sets the record straight regarding the organization’s involvement with the military-medical-petrochemical-pharmaceutical cartel’s focus on acoustic science to identify sounds useful in war; modern musical technologies that produce vibrational frequencies applicable to public persuasion and crowd control, and the synchronous institutional standardization of A=440Hz musical instrument tuning used throughout the Western World as advanced by partnered military and commercial investors during the first half of the Twentieth Century.

President Dwight Eisenhower protested against this “beast,” warning our parents that globalist threats to “Economic, Political, and even Spiritual” freedoms were mounting. (34)
Populations are now tethered like sheep by psycho-emotional attachments and addictions to whatever this cartel sells and promotes through radio and television. This amounts to ENSLAVEMENT for the conduct of genocide.
In essence, this “military-industrial complex,” rooted in the world of investment banking, has advanced a covert operation to control populations most loudly and profitably. Music bioenergetically affects your body chemistry, psycho-neuro-immunology, and health. (35)
Your body is now vibrating musically, audibly and subliminally, according to an institutionally imposed frequency that resonates in harmony with aggression and in dissonance with LOVE.
Intensive research into the military and commercial value of compelling “herd behavior” with music to induce stress, promote diseases, and suppress spirituality, has enabled the world’s wealthiest people to exercise cultural control through “programming.”

From this historic evidence in Rockefeller Foundation Archives, it is clear that the investors in A=440Hz “standard tuning,” some of the least trust-worthy entities on earth, directed the US Navy’s involvement in this “black-op” engaging the consortium-controlled networks. These findings strongly suggest the military’s acoustic frequency research and technological developments advanced during the 1930s to induce psychosocial pathology, herd behavior, emotional distress, and “mass hysteria,” were successfully deployed and are now being used against We The People.

Alternatively, musical frequencies most beneficial to health, psychosocial harmony, and world peace have been suppressed.

These findings offer a most reasonable, simple, pleasant, and powerful remedy residing in restoring naturally preferred frequencies to music. Instruments and voices tuned to A=444Hz frequency are far more acoustically pleasing, instinctively attractive, kinesthetically stimulating, spiritually refreshing, scientifically linked to genetic repair, and arguably, even resonating pure LOVE.

Given that the education and entertainment industries are so negatively controlled and behaviorally controlling, alternatives to the major networks are now required to free We The People. This was the original American assignment given the media according to the US. Constitution and Bill of Rights, vanquished by the Rockefeller-Rothschild industrialists.

Many musicians, mathematicians, physicians, physicists, and even geneticists, now celebrate the emergence of truth about A=444Hz (C(5)=528Hz) as an apparent carrier wave of LOVE, broadcasting universally from the heart of the electromagnetic energy matrix. (7, 22)

The vast majority of objective investigators now view these revelations as an opportunity to rediscover our spiritual roots in music, in accordance with an accelerating Spiritual Renaissance. The emergence of this knowledge is perfectly timed to remedy otherwise impossible problems imposed on the world by unelected leaders of economic and geopolitical chaos.
Thus, musicians, vocalists, and audiences are urged to discuss these findings, reject the militarization of music that has been secretly administered, and retune instruments, voices, and ears to frequencies most sustaining and healing. Restoring integrity to the performing arts and sciences this way will impact populations most beneficially.
A not-for-profit service operating by donation to provide A=444Hz (C(5)=528Hz) frequency transpositions of every genre of music is under construction to accommodate the needs and encouragements of recording artists and audiophiles worldwide advancing this Healthy World Revolution.

Musicians and vocalists are the life-stream of the music industry, and humanity’s last hope for physical salvation and Divine-human connection. The spiritual musical portals through which planetary rebirth and harmonization is destined, await your vision and activism.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Leonard G. Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH, DNM (hon.) is an internationally known authority in behavioral science, public health, emerging diseases, and natural healing. A graduate of Harvard University specializing in media persuasion for health education, this filmmaker and author of sixteen books is globally considered the most credentialed and accomplished critic of the pharmaceutical cartel. A proponent of natural healing, Dr. Horowitz has been honored as a “World Leading Intellectual” y officials of the World Organization for Natural Medicine for his revelations in the musical mathematics of creationism that are impacting the fields of metaphysics, creative consciousness, sacred geometry, musicology, and natural healing according to his life’s mission ~ to help fulfill humanity’s Divine destiny to actualize world peace and permacultural sustainability.

Contact Dr. Horowitz at info@healthyworldaffiliates.com.


1. 1) Merck Veterinary Manual. Social Behavior. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc., 2008.
2. 2) Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown, 2000.
3. 3) Frater J. Top 10 bizarre cases of mass hysteria. Listverse ultimate top 10 lists.
4. 4) Wessely S. Protean nature of mass sociogenic illness: From possessed nuns to chemical and biological terrorism fears. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2002:180;300-306.
5. 5) Bartholomew RE. Occupational Mass Psychogenic Illness. A Transcultural Perspective.Transcultural Psychiatry: 2000;37;4, 495-524.
6. 6) Horowitz LG. DNA: Pirates of the Sacred Spiral. Sandpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Press, 2004.
7. 7) Horowitz LG. Walk on Water. Sandpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Press, 2005.
8. 8) Tobias J. Composing for the Media: Hanns Eisler and Rockefeller Foundation Projects in Film Music, Radio Listening, and Theatrical Sound Design. Rockefeller Archive Center Research Reports Online, 2009.
9. 9) Jubilee, 2012. The House of Rothschild. June 21, 2008.
10. 10)Horowitz LG. Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism & Toxic Warfare. Tetrahedron Press, (June) 2001.
11. 11)Schauf TD. The Federal Reserve Is A PRIVATELY OWNED Corporation. (See:http://proliberty.com/observer/20090404.htm)
12. 12)Institute for Advanced Study. Albert Einstein. (See: http://www.ias.edu/people/einstein)
13. 13) Institute for Advanced Study. Mission and History. (See: http://www.ias.edu/about/mission-and-history)
14. 14) Horowitz LG. The American Red Double-Cross. Idaho Observer, October, 2001.
15. 15) Hilmes M. Creating links between British and American broadcasters in the 1930s. Rockefeller Archive Center Research Reports Online, 2009.
16. 16) Elvis Presley Pictures. Elvis Presley Vancouver, Canada. Empire Stadium, August 31, 1957.
17. 17) Wikipedia. Colonel Tom Parker.
18. 18) Wikipedia. RCA
19. 19) Robertson P. The New World Order. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc. 1982.
20. 20) Cavanagh L. A brief history of the establishment of international standard pitch A=440 Hertz. (Pdf file is available for a free download. See reference here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concert_pitch
21. 21) Collins BT. The Importance of 432hz Music. See: http://www.omega432.com/music.html
22. 22) Horowitz LG. LOVE528.com website and the online journal HYDROSONICS provides much information on the 528Hz frequency.
23. 23) Koehler D. Pianos, Violin, and New Concert “A.” Concert for the Living Water, LIVE H2O, Official Forum. Discussion on A=444 (528), Jan. 25, 2010.
24. 24) Koehler D. Personal communication, May, 2010.
25. 25) Anonymous author of blog provides relevant discussion including Scientific American (March 1965, p. 28) reference to genetic repair using natural frequencies.
26. 26) Peterkin T. Israel banned the Beatles fearing ‘hysteria.’ Telegraph.co.uk. Sept. 22, 2008
27. 27) Horowitz LG. LOVE the Real da Vinci CODE. Sandpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Press, 2007.
28. 28) Horowitz LG and Pulio J. Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse. Sandpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Press, 1998.
29. 29) Horowitz LG. Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident or Intentional? Rockport, MA: Tetrahedron Press, 1998.
30. 30) The National Cyclopedia of American Biography. John Calhoun Deagan. Volume 43, pp. 391-392. (See: http://thescreamonline.com/photo/photo10-01/garygoss/deaganbio.html).
31. 31) Gates B. TED Conference lecture: Reducing global warming by reducing populations via vaccines and more. February, 2010.
32. 32) United Nations. Population challenges and Development Goals. New York: UN Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (ST/ESA/SERA/248), 2005.
33. 33) Eisler, Hanns, Gespräch mit Hans Bunge: Fragen Sie mehr über Brecht. Munich: Rogner and Bernhard, 1976, p. 157.
34. 34) Eisenhower DD. Military-Industrial Complex Speech. Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960 p. 1035-1040.
35. 35) Horowitz LG. Healing Celebrations: Miraculous Recoveries Through Anxient Scripture, Natural Medicine & Modern Science. Sandpoint, ID: Tetrahedron Press, 2000.
36. 36) Walton M and Horowitz LG. Synthesizer re-tuning to the “Perfect Circle of Sound:” A preliminary study with implications for bioenergetic healing. Hydrosonics 2009:1;1:1.

No comments: